2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/coginfocom.2017.8268278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic repetitions, task-based experience and a proxy measure of mutual understanding

Abstract: Abstract-The way dialogue partners collaborate to achieve a joint task is dependent on the way they construct a common ground of knowledge. Diverse conversational mechanisms are involved in developing a common ground, and repetition phenomena appear to be strongly connected to these processes. This article describes the use of an automatic method to detect, within dialogue transcripts, linguistic cues of engagement and synchrony, by observing repetitions at different linguistic levels. We focus on the relation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independently, one may may presume that it is a goal of coginfocom, from a scientific perspective, to understand the dynamics of human cognition and communication. This work contributes in the latter manner, but this work is not alone in the field in trying to contribute to knowledge about the base-line provided by un-augmented humans (such work explores many dimensions of human perception, thought and interaction; see, for example, [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]). Moreover, these two sides of coginfocom are not in opposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently, one may may presume that it is a goal of coginfocom, from a scientific perspective, to understand the dynamics of human cognition and communication. This work contributes in the latter manner, but this work is not alone in the field in trying to contribute to knowledge about the base-line provided by un-augmented humans (such work explores many dimensions of human perception, thought and interaction; see, for example, [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]). Moreover, these two sides of coginfocom are not in opposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not directly assessing collaboration as a quantity on its own, a number of researchers have tried to assess behaviors in dialogue that lead to success in achieving tasks through dialogue [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. However, it seems clear that it is possible to collaborate extensively without achieving mutual understanding or task-related success in task-based dialogue.…”
Section: Approaches To Assessing Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It becomes interesting to consider how much and what kind of repetition in conversation is interesting and revealing of enagement and mutual understanding. Recent work has attempted to demonstrate the extent to which repetition in dialog correlates with task success [18]- [20]. Other work is developing profiles of dialogs according to levels of repetition effects (repetition of self, and repetition of others) as measures of interlocutor synchronization and relative involvement in dialog, in support of quantifying evidence of mutual understanding [11]- [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%