2015
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amv049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Predictors of Cultural Identification in Bilinguals

Abstract: Most of the world's population has knowledge of at least two languages. Many of these bilinguals are also exposed to and identify with at least two cultures. Because language knowledge enables participation in cultural practices and expression of cultural beliefs, bilingual experience and cultural identity are interconnected. However, the specific links between bilingualism and cultural identity remain largely unidentified. The current study examined which aspects of bilingualism relate to identification with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We sought to confirm that “potential primes” were considered representative by individuals who interact regularly with the depicted culture. Current language exposure, time in host country, and affirmation of ethnic labels have all shown relevant relationships with cultural identification (Blackledge & Pavlenko, 2001; Duan & Vu, 2000; Kiang et al, 2011; Schroeder et al, 2017). Thus, from our available data, we combined three factors to create a proxy for respondents’ proximity to Hispanic or US-American culture: (1) relative daily language usage: 0 = 100% Spanish usage, 1 = 100% English usage; (2) proportion of life spent in the US: 0 = no time, 1 = native born; and (3) relative endorsement of terms distinct to each culture: 0 = complete endorsement of Hispanic terms and no endorsement of US-American terms, 1 = complete endorsement of US-American terms and no endorsement of Hispanic terms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sought to confirm that “potential primes” were considered representative by individuals who interact regularly with the depicted culture. Current language exposure, time in host country, and affirmation of ethnic labels have all shown relevant relationships with cultural identification (Blackledge & Pavlenko, 2001; Duan & Vu, 2000; Kiang et al, 2011; Schroeder et al, 2017). Thus, from our available data, we combined three factors to create a proxy for respondents’ proximity to Hispanic or US-American culture: (1) relative daily language usage: 0 = 100% Spanish usage, 1 = 100% English usage; (2) proportion of life spent in the US: 0 = no time, 1 = native born; and (3) relative endorsement of terms distinct to each culture: 0 = complete endorsement of Hispanic terms and no endorsement of US-American terms, 1 = complete endorsement of US-American terms and no endorsement of Hispanic terms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large heterogeneous sample of adult bilinguals varying in language and cultural backgrounds, Schroeder et al (2017) identified the linguistic factors that predict cultural identification. Increased first language (L1) exposure through media, higher L1 proficiency, fewer years immersed in a second language (L2) family context, but more years immersed in an L2 school/work context led to increased firstlanguage cultural affiliation.…”
Section: Cultural Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language is a multi-faceted phenomenon. The relationship between language and cultural identification can differ depending on the language characteristic under investigation (Schroeder et al, 2017). We focus here on three language characteristicspractice, exposure and proficiencyas we believe these most strongly affect children's ability to connect with their social environments, which is crucial for establishing an emotional connection between language and identity.…”
Section: Distinguishing Between Language Practice Exposure and Profimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study that has incorporated both types of identification indicates that language characteristics affect ethnic and national identification in different ways. Some characteristics only affect national identification, others only the identification with the ethnic group and still others influence both types of identification (Schroeder, Lam, & Marian, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%