Language Awareness and Multilingualism 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02325-0_27-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Landscape and Multilingualism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to overcome the sign identification obstacle, Gorter and Cenoz (2017) suggested establishing a definite criterion to improve the validity of the study, although a margin of arbitrariness is claimed to be inevitable. Several researchers criticized the quantitative approach as the sole tool for data collection, selecting a more qualitative approach in their studies of linguistic landscapes, shifting their focus from the sign as an object, into people's relationship to the signage.…”
Section: Methodological Framework In Llsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to overcome the sign identification obstacle, Gorter and Cenoz (2017) suggested establishing a definite criterion to improve the validity of the study, although a margin of arbitrariness is claimed to be inevitable. Several researchers criticized the quantitative approach as the sole tool for data collection, selecting a more qualitative approach in their studies of linguistic landscapes, shifting their focus from the sign as an object, into people's relationship to the signage.…”
Section: Methodological Framework In Llsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the interdisciplinary nature of LL research (Van Mensel et al 2016;Gorter and Cenoz 2017) aligns well with a main tenet in minority language research, namely to take into account the multiplicity of forces that act upon the vitality and status of minority languages, including political, ideological, sociological, economic, and educational forces. If the lack of a common theoretical ground in LL research has sometimes been highlighted for criticism (see e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A recurring theme in LL studies is the use of LL signs in language learning. So far, attention has centered on using the LL for contextual input in teaching a second language (e. g., Sayer, 2009;Gorter & Cenoz, 2017;Malinowski, 2019;Malinowski et al, 2020). Researchers and instructors have often linked language learning to raising one's linguistic, cultural, and sociopolitical awareness of a target-language's speakers' environment.…”
Section: Ll Studies For Teaching Languagementioning
confidence: 99%