2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203857175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Imperialism Continued

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
226
0
52

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
226
0
52
Order By: Relevance
“…The third set of reasons is practical. Not only has increasing human mobility given rise to more widespread multilingualism, but the integral role of English in processes of globalization (Phillipson, 2003(Phillipson, , 2009) means that in many ethnolinguistic groups, speakers who were once bilingual are now trilingual (Cenoz & Jessner, 2000). Additionally, as a result of the reframing of English as a basic educational skill, as opposed to a foreign language (Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2011), millions of school students, in addition to their native language(s), are now learning English in their early years of school and a second foreign language later on in secondary education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third set of reasons is practical. Not only has increasing human mobility given rise to more widespread multilingualism, but the integral role of English in processes of globalization (Phillipson, 2003(Phillipson, , 2009) means that in many ethnolinguistic groups, speakers who were once bilingual are now trilingual (Cenoz & Jessner, 2000). Additionally, as a result of the reframing of English as a basic educational skill, as opposed to a foreign language (Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2011), millions of school students, in addition to their native language(s), are now learning English in their early years of school and a second foreign language later on in secondary education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoy en día, muchos autores (Canagarajah, 1999;Canale, 2015;Macedo, Dendrinos y Gounari, 2003;Pennycook, 1994;Phillipson, 1992Phillipson, , 2010 hablan de la hegemonía del inglés en el mundo, debido a que a lo largo de la historia moderna ha sido usado como el idioma por excelencia en las relaciones comerciales, personales, y como medio de acceso a la información mundial, particularmente en la era digital. Desde esta perspectiva, se asume esta lengua como "universal" e "internacional", lo cual sugiere que el inglés es una herramienta de acceso al progreso y a la modernización de los pueblos, es decir, un vehículo "neutral" para la comunicación internacional, libre de ideologías y valores culturales.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The early claim of English imperialism has been followed by a challenge to the ideology of native speakerism (Holliday, 2005;Phillipson, , 2009, in which native language ideology is challenged. The protection of Chinese language and culture against the "ill effects of 'Western values'" (Bolton & Botha, 2015, p. 172) seems to highlight this issue.…”
Section: Rq1mentioning
confidence: 99%