2018
DOI: 10.1556/2062.2018.65.4.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic exhaustivity inference is context dependent

Abstract: The study investigates contextual effects on the processing of pre-verbal (preVf) and postverbal (postVf) focus sentences in an eye-tracking experiment. For comparison, lexically marked focus (only-f) sentences were also included. The test sentences were presented following two types of linguistic context: restrictive or non-restrictive. It was hypothesized that if preVf exhaustivity is purely structurally encoded, gaze will converge on the exhaustive target image at a similar rate in the two contexts, just as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one might raise the objection that exhaustivity is also part of the core semantic meaning of preVf sentences, as opposed to neutral sentences, in which exhaustivity is not assumed to be represented semantically. Such theories, however (see e.g., Kiss, 1998;Kenesei, 2006) have not been supported by experimental data (see e.g., Onea and Beaver, 2009;Kas and Lukács, 2013;Gerocs et al, 2014;Káldi et al, 2016;Káldi and Babarczy, 2018). Furthermore, recent experimental evidence suggest that the use of focus may not only be strictly motivated by linguistic factors, and that these factors should be best seen as pragmatic ones (Stevens and Roberts, 2019;Káldi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, one might raise the objection that exhaustivity is also part of the core semantic meaning of preVf sentences, as opposed to neutral sentences, in which exhaustivity is not assumed to be represented semantically. Such theories, however (see e.g., Kiss, 1998;Kenesei, 2006) have not been supported by experimental data (see e.g., Onea and Beaver, 2009;Kas and Lukács, 2013;Gerocs et al, 2014;Káldi et al, 2016;Káldi and Babarczy, 2018). Furthermore, recent experimental evidence suggest that the use of focus may not only be strictly motivated by linguistic factors, and that these factors should be best seen as pragmatic ones (Stevens and Roberts, 2019;Káldi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the one hand the present experiments showed that the availability of a set facilitates preVf use. On the other hand, the results of Káldi and Babarczy (2017) and Káldi and Babarczy (2018) demonstrate that if this set is either explicitly or implicitly given, the likelihood that preVf is interpreted exhaustively increases. To approach the question from a different perspective, note that according to É. , preVf sentences have an exhaustive interpretation: for example if an answer to a narrow-wh-question is to be understood exhaustively, a preVf is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another, independent observation may account for the dominating proportions of preVf sentences in the conditions containing sets in the present experiments. Káldi and Babarczy (2017) and Káldi and Babarczy (2018), in a series of visual world experiments, presented preVf, neutral and lexically marked focus sentences in contexts containing either explicit or implicit sets, and studied the rate of exhaustive interpretations of the presented sentence types. It was observed that in the case of preVf sentences, the rates of exhaustive interpretation were around 90% (where a chance level was 50%) in all conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Szemmozgás-követéses vizsgálatokat olyan tudományterületeken alkalmaznak, mint a pszichológia, orvosi klinikai, ipari kutatások, informatika. A pszichológiában például a kognitív pszichológiai kutatások, szociálpszichológiai kutatások terén terjedtek el leginkább, a vizsgálatok középpontjában az információfeldolgozás, a figyelem, a vizuális észlelés, az olvasás, tanulás állnak (Schroeder, Hyönä, & Liversedge, 2015;Demeter et al, 2015;Káldi & Babarczy, 2018). Használják az eszközt a csecsemők és gyerekek fejlődésének vizsgálatára (pl.…”
Section: Szemmozgáskövetéses Vizsgálatok a Marketingbenunclassified