The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781118786093.iela0237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Diversity in South Asia, Reconsidered

Abstract: In this entry, we reconsider the topic of Linguistic Diversity in South Asia – the title of the landmark 1960 volume edited by Charles Ferguson and John Gumperz – from the perspective of contemporary sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. Reviewing a number of case studies, we argue that empirical and theoretical accounts of language, diversity, and South Asia cannot be disassociated from the ideologies and political projects that construe, objectify, and performatively realize s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such assessments, Jonathan Rosa argues, are not limited to individualized speakers, but rather “invoke broader ideas about the (in)competence and (il)legitimacy of entire racialized groups” (2016, 163–64). These interpretations are alimented by long‐standing racist, colonial tropes of (in)competent populations that reinforce “essentializing relationships between language, ethnicity and personhood” (Carlan, 2018, 118; see also Bauman and Briggs, 2003; Nakassis and Annamalai, 2020). Not only are these discourses mobilized to delegitimize the speech practices of racialized actors, but they also serve moralizing agendas about falling language standards that are often aligned with (not very successfully) veiled racist tropes.…”
Section: Standards Models and Speakersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such assessments, Jonathan Rosa argues, are not limited to individualized speakers, but rather “invoke broader ideas about the (in)competence and (il)legitimacy of entire racialized groups” (2016, 163–64). These interpretations are alimented by long‐standing racist, colonial tropes of (in)competent populations that reinforce “essentializing relationships between language, ethnicity and personhood” (Carlan, 2018, 118; see also Bauman and Briggs, 2003; Nakassis and Annamalai, 2020). Not only are these discourses mobilized to delegitimize the speech practices of racialized actors, but they also serve moralizing agendas about falling language standards that are often aligned with (not very successfully) veiled racist tropes.…”
Section: Standards Models and Speakersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowlands have a rich cultural and historical heritage, shaped by the intense mixing of different races, cultures, and religions throughout history. It is home to over 800 ethnicities who speak more than 1500 languages, making it one of the world's most ethnically and linguistically diverse areas (Phillips, Gritzner, 2003;Nakassis, Annamalai, 2020). Today, the main characteristic of the population in the Hindustan Plains is its size, with over 700 million inhabitants living in an area of 1,152,200 km2 and an average population density of approximately 630 people per square kilometer, which is significantly higher than the population density in other parts of the world (Hobbs, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%