“…The second limit has to do with focus: "If we only privilege the analysis of practices of social control, ideological domination, discursive hegemony, sociolinguistic orders or dominant ideologies, we block our perception, and even our own imagination, to those voices that act for change" (p. 75). Bonnin's conclusion resonates with similar ones in studies on agency, resistance, and hope (e.g., Awayed-Bishara, 2021;Charalambous, Charalambous, Zembylas, & Theodorou, 2020;Milani, 2022;Mahmood, 2001Mahmood, , 2005Moita Lopes, 2020;, as well as our own perception of the agentive, non-melancholic, and proactive stance of faveladas/os when faced with the dynamics of social domination. In this regard, Mattingly's (2010) words about the frictional interplay of structure and agency are as critical as they are blunt: "Reality needs to be exposed as a space of possibility and not only of imprisonment or structural reproduction.…”