2021
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.3009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Citizenship in the EFL Classroom: Granting the Local a Voice Through English

Abstract: This article examines the constitutive role of English as a foreign language (EFL) as a cultural discourse of action and empowerment through which teachers in marginalized, specifically conflict‐ridden, educational contexts act as agents of social and educational change. Although current approaches to teaching English accentuate its transformative role, EFL pedagogies still often reproduce hegemonic and exclusionary ideologies. Drawing on an ethnographic EFL classroom case study, the author conducts a critical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second limit has to do with focus: "If we only privilege the analysis of practices of social control, ideological domination, discursive hegemony, sociolinguistic orders or dominant ideologies, we block our perception, and even our own imagination, to those voices that act for change" (p. 75). Bonnin's conclusion resonates with similar ones in studies on agency, resistance, and hope (e.g., Awayed-Bishara, 2021;Charalambous, Charalambous, Zembylas, & Theodorou, 2020;Milani, 2022;Mahmood, 2001Mahmood, , 2005Moita Lopes, 2020;, as well as our own perception of the agentive, non-melancholic, and proactive stance of faveladas/os when faced with the dynamics of social domination. In this regard, Mattingly's (2010) words about the frictional interplay of structure and agency are as critical as they are blunt: "Reality needs to be exposed as a space of possibility and not only of imprisonment or structural reproduction.…”
Section: Hope In Sociolinguisticssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The second limit has to do with focus: "If we only privilege the analysis of practices of social control, ideological domination, discursive hegemony, sociolinguistic orders or dominant ideologies, we block our perception, and even our own imagination, to those voices that act for change" (p. 75). Bonnin's conclusion resonates with similar ones in studies on agency, resistance, and hope (e.g., Awayed-Bishara, 2021;Charalambous, Charalambous, Zembylas, & Theodorou, 2020;Milani, 2022;Mahmood, 2001Mahmood, , 2005Moita Lopes, 2020;, as well as our own perception of the agentive, non-melancholic, and proactive stance of faveladas/os when faced with the dynamics of social domination. In this regard, Mattingly's (2010) words about the frictional interplay of structure and agency are as critical as they are blunt: "Reality needs to be exposed as a space of possibility and not only of imprisonment or structural reproduction.…”
Section: Hope In Sociolinguisticssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…1For example, Awayed-Bishara (2021), Gspandl et al (2023), Lim et al (2018), and Williams et al (2022). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the introduction of the notion of linguistic imperialism (Philipson, 1992), inequalities between English and other languages fiercely started to be a matter of critique in the field of applied linguistics. (Awayed-Bishara, 2021). Despite all the criticism, still much focus is on Inner Circle varieties of English in educational settings, particularly British English (BrE) and American English (AmE) (Modiano, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%