1993
DOI: 10.1016/0166-8641(93)90057-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearly ordered extensions of GO spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) SinceM has a dense subspace M × {0} (homeomorphic to M) which is not perfect,M is not perfect and thus it is not metrizable. By [5]C is not perfect and thus not metrizable. Since M and C have the underlying LOTS R, by Theorem 2.1, the projection mappings φ 1 :M → R and φ 2 :C → R are (finite-to-one) closed mappings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(3) SinceM has a dense subspace M × {0} (homeomorphic to M) which is not perfect,M is not perfect and thus it is not metrizable. By [5]C is not perfect and thus not metrizable. Since M and C have the underlying LOTS R, by Theorem 2.1, the projection mappings φ 1 :M → R and φ 2 :C → R are (finite-to-one) closed mappings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that paracompactness, metrizability and quasi-developability of X are preserved by X * . However, these properties of X are not hereditary toX (see [5]). Since the Sorgenfrey line S and the Michael line M are submetrizable they have the continuous Urysohn property P. M * has P [2], but S * andS do not have P [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of these is X * and was defined by D. J. Lutzer [7]. The other one is L(X) and was studied in [8]. We review here the definitions of those linearly ordered extensions.…”
Section: Two Linearly Ordered Extensions and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easily seen that X * contains X as a closed subset and L(X) contains X as a dense subset. See [7,8] for further information about X * and L(X). In both cases, X and X × {0} are identified by the correspondence of x to (x, 0).…”
Section: S δ -Diagonals In Linearly Ordered Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%