2005
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/22/12/006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearized solutions of the Einstein equations within a Bondi–Sachs framework, and implications for boundary conditions in numerical simulations

Abstract: We linearize the Einstein equations when the metric is Bondi-Sachs, when the background is Schwarzschild or Minkowski, and when there is a matter source in the form of a thin shell whose density varies with time and angular position. By performing an eigenfunction decomposition, we reduce the problem to a system of linear ordinary differential equations which we are able to solve. The solutions are relevant to the characteristic formulation of numerical relativity: (a) as exact solutions against which computat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4.3 of ref. [47] for the case of a dynamic spacetime on a Minkowski background with = 2, m = 0. We write…”
Section: A Linearized Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.3 of ref. [47] for the case of a dynamic spacetime on a Minkowski background with = 2, m = 0. We write…”
Section: A Linearized Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bishop and collaborators [18,19] proposed a procedure to find linearized perturbations on a Schwarzschild background. However, in their approach "...some of the expressions get very complicated and in order to simplify the presentation we now specialize to the case l = 2..." [18] to obtain the solution is overly complicated, although the calculation of linearized perturbations is achievable by a simpler method. Nevertheless, Reisswig et al [20] determined a l = 3 multipole using Bishop's approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above construction was not made in [16] because in that work it was possible to neglect the imaginary component in J and U. However, we shall see that it is not the case for odd-parity perturbations.…”
Section: Complex Notationmentioning
confidence: 98%