2008
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drm051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearization of matrix polynomials expressed in polynomial bases

Abstract: Companion matrices of matrix polynomials L(λ) (with possibly singular leading coefficient) are a familiar tool in matrix theory and numerical practice leading to so-called "linearizations" λB − A of the polynomials. Matrix polynomials as approximations to more general matrix functions lead to the study of matrix polynomials represented in a variety of classical systems of polynomials, including orthogonal systems and Lagrange polynomials, for example. For several such representations, it is shown how to constr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
221
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
221
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, suppose P is a matrix polynomial whose Jordan characteristic at λ 0 is J (P , λ 0 ) = (0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 3, 4). Then the truncated Jordan characteristic of P at λ 0 will be just (1,3,4). We define this formally as follows.…”
Section: Lemma 45 (Basic Properties Of Jordan Characteristic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, suppose P is a matrix polynomial whose Jordan characteristic at λ 0 is J (P , λ 0 ) = (0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 3, 4). Then the truncated Jordan characteristic of P at λ 0 will be just (1,3,4). We define this formally as follows.…”
Section: Lemma 45 (Basic Properties Of Jordan Characteristic)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the conditions in Definition 4.9 can be relaxed as in [40] to allow E λ 0 (λ) and F λ 0 (λ) to be any matrix functions that are invertible at λ 0 and analytic in a neighborhood of λ 0 (e.g., rational matrices whose determinants have no zeroes or poles at λ 0 ). This extension was used in [3] to study linearizations.…”
Section: Definition 411 (Local Smith Form)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be viewed as another kind of structure preservation, i.e., a preservation of the polynomial basis. Although there are precedents for doing this for scalar polynomials in [10], and even earlier in [33], the first serious effort in this direction for matrix polynomials was [5] and the earlier [17], where concrete templates for producing strong linearizations were provided, one for each of several classical polynomial bases, including Chebyshev, Newton, Lagrange, and Bernstein bases. This work has been used in [26], as part of a Chebyshev interpolation method for solving non-polynomial nonlinear eigenproblems.…”
Section: Related Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linearizations discussed in [2] for general polynomial bases satisfying a threeterm recurrence relation all admit a highly structured block LU factorization similar to the one discussed above. It is therefore likely that the TOAR method can be extended to this more general setting.…”
Section: Extension To σ =mentioning
confidence: 99%