2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearization improves the repeatability of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Abstract: In simulations and experimental results, linearization improves the repeatability of quantitative DCE-MRI by at least 30%, making it as repeatable as semi-quantitative metrics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10,21,26 One of these studies examined FTV obtained using a manual segmentation method aided with visualization of SER maps and reported a slight improvement in predictive performance for volumes measured using this method. 23 Although segmentation in the current study was performed on early phase subtractions by referencing PE instead of SER, the ETV measurements were similar to those reported by Henderson et al 23 Because the setup and contrast injection protocols are fairly standardized across institutions and the semi-quantitative DCE MRI measurements have shown strong reproducibility, the FTV measurements in the current study were comparable to those obtained in other studies using a semi-automatic tool 28,29 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…9,10,21,26 One of these studies examined FTV obtained using a manual segmentation method aided with visualization of SER maps and reported a slight improvement in predictive performance for volumes measured using this method. 23 Although segmentation in the current study was performed on early phase subtractions by referencing PE instead of SER, the ETV measurements were similar to those reported by Henderson et al 23 Because the setup and contrast injection protocols are fairly standardized across institutions and the semi-quantitative DCE MRI measurements have shown strong reproducibility, the FTV measurements in the current study were comparable to those obtained in other studies using a semi-automatic tool 28,29 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…-50 Rata et al51 reported a lower wCV of 7.5% when using a population AIF in a group of patients with abdominal tumors. To improve the accuracy of TK estimation, the promising approach presented by Brynolfsson et al 52 could be used, where they showed with simulated data that the concentration values…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data were corrected for geometrical distortions due to susceptibility effects ( Andersson et al, 2003 ) and gradient nonlinearities. ( Glasser et al, 2013 , Jones et al, 2018 , Setsompop et al, 2013 ) Spatially varying effective b-values to account for gradient nonlinearities were also computed. ( Bammer et al, 2003 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%