2003
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.10064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearity of homogeneous order‐one solutions to elliptic equations in dimension three

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only difference is that, instead of relying on Proposition 2.1, we use the fact that any non-parametric minimal cone of dimension three must be flat, see Theorem 2.3], [B, Theorem]. For a quick PDE proof of this fact, see [HNY,p.2].…”
Section: ])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only difference is that, instead of relying on Proposition 2.1, we use the fact that any non-parametric minimal cone of dimension three must be flat, see Theorem 2.3], [B, Theorem]. For a quick PDE proof of this fact, see [HNY,p.2].…”
Section: ])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Euclidean space, we give two proofs only using maximum principle. The idea comes from [15] and [18]. For hyperbolic and spherical space cases, we use Beltrami map to extend the infinitesimal rigidity in Euclidean space to space forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first inequality in (10) follows (8) and (12). The proof for φ E follows the same argument and the following facts: Proof.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Acknowledgement: The first author would like to thank Professor Louis Nirenberg for stimulation conversations. Our initial proof was the global maximum principle for C 3 surfaces Lemma 5 and Corollary 6 (we only realized the connection of the result of [12] to Theorem 1 afterward). It was Professor Louis Nirenberg who brought our attention to the paper of [14] and suggested using the unique continuation theorem of [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%