2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00342-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear trend analysis: a comparison of methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the method can be used on data that are not normally distributed, which is commonly the case with environmental data and it is also robust for extreme values and possible outliers (Helsel and Hirsch, 1992). The Seasonal Kendall has also been shown to be reliable in comparison with other methods for trend analysis and to maintain a high power with different trend functions (Hess et al, 2001). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the method can be used on data that are not normally distributed, which is commonly the case with environmental data and it is also robust for extreme values and possible outliers (Helsel and Hirsch, 1992). The Seasonal Kendall has also been shown to be reliable in comparison with other methods for trend analysis and to maintain a high power with different trend functions (Hess et al, 2001). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mann-Kendall test has been extensively used to analyze linear trends in hydrological datasets (e.g. Burn and Hag Elnur, 2002;Hamed, 2008;Yip et al, 2012), proving better results than other methods (Hess et al, 2001). As recommended by Hamed and Rao (1998) time series autocorrelation was removed before performing the Mann-Kendall test to eliminate the detection of false trends.…”
Section: Trend and Change Point Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time series are tested for the presence of monotonically increasing or decreasing trends (referred as 'monotonic trends') using the Mann-Kendall and Spearman tests (Mann, 1945;Kendall, 1975;Helsel and Hirsch, 1993;Hess et al, 2001;McCuen, 2003;Kundzewicz and Robson, 2004). Similar to the Pettitt test, they are nonparametric and have similar power (Yue et al, 2002).…”
Section: Change-point and Trend Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%