2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.97.051302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear-time general decoding algorithm for the surface code

Abstract: A quantum error correcting protocol can be substantially improved by taking into account features of the physical noise process. We present an efficient decoder for the surface code which can account for general noise features, including coherences and correlations. We demonstrate that the decoder significantly outperforms the conventional matching algorithm on a variety of noise models, including non-Pauli noise and spatially correlated noise. The algorithm is based on an approximate calculation of the logica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe a similar improvement in performance using the tensor-network decoder described in Ref. [29] when defined on the rotated layout and with an analogous tensor-network layout. Exact decoding is achieved with χ = 4 for pure Y noise, which is not as efficient as the improved MPS decoder described above but substantially more efficient than the MPS decoder on the standard layout.…”
Section: Improved Tensor-network Decoding Of Rotated Codes With Bsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We observe a similar improvement in performance using the tensor-network decoder described in Ref. [29] when defined on the rotated layout and with an analogous tensor-network layout. Exact decoding is achieved with χ = 4 for pure Y noise, which is not as efficient as the improved MPS decoder described above but substantially more efficient than the MPS decoder on the standard layout.…”
Section: Improved Tensor-network Decoding Of Rotated Codes With Bsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In contrast, CNOT 12 showed the worst fidelity and the worst unitarity but a reasonably good performance, without suffering from the systematic error present in CR2 and CR4. Hence the gate metrics under investigation do not provide reliable information of how well and how often a certain gate may be used in an algorithm (see also the conclusion in [50]). As this information is essential for potential users of gate-based quantum computers, it should be included in the specification sheet of the physical device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], a hard decoding algorithm was proposed for optimizing thresholds of concatenated codes afflicted by general Markovian noise channels. In [22,23], tensor network algorithms were used for simulating the surface code and obtaining efficient decoders for general noise features. However, the above schemes are not adapted to fault-tolerant protocols where gate and measurement errors plays a significant role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%