1972
DOI: 10.1029/jb077i035p07115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear thermal expansion coefficients of orthopyroxene to 1000°C

Abstract: The linear thermal expansion coefficients of a bronzite specimen with the approximate molecular formula (Mg.8Fe.2)SiO3 have been measured by an X‐ray diffractometer technique in the range 25°–1000°C in an air atmosphere. The linear thermal expansion coefficients determined for the crystallographic a, b, and c directions are α11 =. 0.164 × 10−4 °C−1, α22 = 0.145 × 10−4 °C−1, and α33 = 0.168 × 10−4 °C−1, respectively. No phase changes were observed in the temperature range studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
3

Year Published

1974
1974
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2). However, there is a significant difference between the thermal expansivity from the present study and the results of Frisillo & Buljan (1972) and Dietrich & Arndt (1982), both of whom used a Fe-rich orthopyroxene in their experiments (Table 1). Because nearly pure Mg end-mem- Fig.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). However, there is a significant difference between the thermal expansivity from the present study and the results of Frisillo & Buljan (1972) and Dietrich & Arndt (1982), both of whom used a Fe-rich orthopyroxene in their experiments (Table 1). Because nearly pure Mg end-mem- Fig.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…ber enstatite was used in the present study, the differences in thermal expansivity might be ascribed to a compositional effect of Mg-Fe substitution. However, the thermal expansion reported by Frisillo & Buljan (1972) is higher than ours by about 12x10 -6 , and that of Dietrich & Arndt (1982) is lower than the present result by roughly an equivalent amount. Therefore, differences in composition do not appear to explain the extreme thermal expansion values of orthoenstatite reported by Frisillo & Buljan (1972) and Dietrich & Arndt (1982), and the reasons for discrepancies between these two studies are not clear.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…generally included. We have used parameters of either forsterite [Skinner, 1962;Kurnazawa and Anderson, 1969] or of bronzite [Frisi!lo and Barsch, 1972;Frisillo and Buljan, 1972] though generally the forsterite values will be employed below.…”
Section: The Moment Of Inertia Of the Moon Can Be Calculated Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For opx, α T ≈ 0.16 10 −4 /℃, irrespective of its composition (Frisillo and Buljan 1972;Sueno, et al 1976) and α P ≈ −3.5 10 −3 / GPa (Angel and Hugh-Jones (1994) for enstatite). For cpx, α T ≈ 0.06 10 −4 /℃ (Cameron, et al (1973) for either hedenbergite of diopside) and α P ≈ −2.8 10 −3 /GPa (Levien and Prewitt (1981) for diopside).…”
Section: -Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%