2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2005.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear splicing and syntactic monoid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for Head's result in [13], a relationship exists between reflexive splicing systems and the notion of a constant introduced by Schützenberger [24]. Furthermore, the above-mentioned marker languages are defined in [2] by means of a marker which is a set of constants. This explains why techniques introduced in [2] have been of great use when obtaining the results presented in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As for Head's result in [13], a relationship exists between reflexive splicing systems and the notion of a constant introduced by Schützenberger [24]. Furthermore, the above-mentioned marker languages are defined in [2] by means of a marker which is a set of constants. This explains why techniques introduced in [2] have been of great use when obtaining the results presented in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the same papers, he designed an algorithm that, for a given regular language L and a given finite set of triples X, allows us to decide whether a language I ⊆ L exists such that L is generated by a finite Head splicing system with X being the set of the rules. As another result, in [2,3] the authors introduced a nontrivial class of languages (marker languages) and proved that these languages are generated by finite Paun systems. The authors also proved that we can decide whether a regular language is a marker language [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For more details on codes the reader is referred to [1,8,20,24]. In [2], the authors have introduced a special type of regular languages using the syntactic congruence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%