2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2013.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear response in the nonequilibrium zero range process

Abstract: We explore a number of explicit response formulae around the boundary driven zero range process to changes in the exit and entrance rates. In such a nonequilibrium regime kinetic (and not only thermodynamic) aspects make a difference in the response. Apart from a number of formal approaches, we illustrate a general decomposition of the linear response into entropic and frenetic contributions, the latter being realized from changes in the dynamical activity at the boundaries. In particular, in this way one obta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The merit of response theory is indeed not its formal appearance-in the end we are all doing Taylor expansion assuming (and sometimes proving) convergence of certain integrals. In particular, for non-equilibrium purposes, we emphasize the importance of the frenetic contribution in response; for different details and discussions, we refer to [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: General Question and Ambitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The merit of response theory is indeed not its formal appearance-in the end we are all doing Taylor expansion assuming (and sometimes proving) convergence of certain integrals. In particular, for non-equilibrium purposes, we emphasize the importance of the frenetic contribution in response; for different details and discussions, we refer to [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: General Question and Ambitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important here to recall that the separation between timesymmetric (frenesy D) and time-antisymmetric (entropy flux S) contributions is obtained via the time-reversal operation [θ in (20)] which should include the perturbation protocol; i.e., we also reverse the time-dependence in the perturbation, cf. the dynamics (36). Let us take an observable, i.e., a function O of the trajectory ω, always in the window [0, t].…”
Section: Response Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is the more important second difference with equilibrium. We believe that kinetic aspects such as those summarized under the name of dynamical activity will become important, and indeed some of that is visible in linear response around nonequilibria, [13]. That will also be taken up in Section IV B.…”
Section: A Thermodynamic Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there the variance of N appears in the frenetic term. That was seen already in the context of linear response for the boundary driven zero range process [20]. In fact, since N is time-symmetric the role of entropic and frenetic contribution gets reversed; even for E = 0 we get only the frenetic part.…”
Section: Toy Model: 1d Random Walkmentioning
confidence: 61%