2015 European Control Conference (ECC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecc.2015.7331007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear quadratic control of LPV systems using static and shifting specifications

Abstract: Abstract-This paper extends some recent results about linear quadratic control (LQC) using linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) to linear parameter varying (LPV) systems. At first, static specifications, where the weighting matrices are constant, are considered. Later, the concept of shifting linear quadratic control (SLQC), where some varying parameters are introduced and used to schedule not only the controller, but the weighting matrices too, is considered. A numerical example is used to illustrate the applica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that what has been discussed in this section about the control of convex systems does not apply only to the problem of controller design for quadratic stabilization but also to the case of other specifications, such as D-stabilization [108], H ∞ control [109], control with guaranteed cost [110] and many more. The described methods can be adapted to deal with convex systems with piecewise constant parameters, which provide a unifying concept lying in between the robust and the gain-scheduled perspectives, including both as extremal cases [111].…”
Section: Final Comments On Control Of Convex Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that what has been discussed in this section about the control of convex systems does not apply only to the problem of controller design for quadratic stabilization but also to the case of other specifications, such as D-stabilization [108], H ∞ control [109], control with guaranteed cost [110] and many more. The described methods can be adapted to deal with convex systems with piecewise constant parameters, which provide a unifying concept lying in between the robust and the gain-scheduled perspectives, including both as extremal cases [111].…”
Section: Final Comments On Control Of Convex Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De forma parecida, se puede realizar el control H ∞ cuadrático utilizando (29), en la cual el término superior izquierdo A(θ) T P + PA(θ) es reemplazado por el término a mano izquierda en (41). Finalmente, de acuerdo con (Rotondo et al, 2015b), el control con coste garantizado puede diseñarse modificando el criterio cuadrático (30) en:…”
Section: Control Por Realimentación Del Estadounclassified
“…First, the proposed work extends the historical evolution of optimal control theory to LPV systems purely analytically. Second, parametric variations and corresponding controllers are not constrained to be polytopic in nature as is usually the case with LMIbased approaches [7,8]. Third, the computational complexity of solving an LMI is greater than that of solving an ARE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SISO linear system affected by parametric variations can be defined in the LPV framework [7] as given below:…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%