2020
DOI: 10.3934/amc.2020024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear programming bounds for distributed storage codes

Abstract: A major issue of locally repairable codes is their robustness. If a local repair group is not able to perform the repair process, this will result in increasing the repair cost. Therefore, it is critical for a locally repairable code to have multiple repair groups. In this paper we consider robust locally repairable coding schemes which guarantee that there exist multiple distinct (not necessarily disjoint) alternative local repair groups for any single failure such that the failed node can still be repaired l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [1], Agarwal et al presented several new combinatorial bounds on LRC codes including the locality-aware sphere packing and Plotkin bounds. Recently, Tebbi et al [36] also obtained a linear programming bound for LRCs with arbitrary code parameters. However, it is not easy to give an explicit form of the C-M bound or the bound in [36] in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [1], Agarwal et al presented several new combinatorial bounds on LRC codes including the locality-aware sphere packing and Plotkin bounds. Recently, Tebbi et al [36] also obtained a linear programming bound for LRCs with arbitrary code parameters. However, it is not easy to give an explicit form of the C-M bound or the bound in [36] in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Tebbi et al [36] also obtained a linear programming bound for LRCs with arbitrary code parameters. However, it is not easy to give an explicit form of the C-M bound or the bound in [36] in general. In [19], Hao et al generalized the C-M bound and obtained a Griesmer-type bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%