2003
DOI: 10.1086/378733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Polarization in Gamma-Ray Bursts: The Case for an Ordered Magnetic Field

Abstract: Linear polarization at the level of ∼ 1 − 3% has by now been measured in several GRB afterglows. Whereas the degree of polarization, P, was found to vary in some sources, the position angle, θ p , was roughly constant in all cases. Until now, the polarization has been commonly attributed to synchrotron radiation from a jet with a tangled magnetic field that is viewed somewhat off axis. However, this model predicts either a peak in P or a 90 • change in θ p around the "jet break" time in the lightcurve, for whi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
281
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
19
281
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar polarization fractions were observed at every point in the light curve with signal-to-noise in flux greater than one ( Figure 6). This is consistent with emission from a small-volume synchrotron source, such as a GRB or other small jet produced in an extremely homogeneous magnetic field (Granot & Königl 2003). It is not clear, however, how this very high polarization fraction corresponds to the non-detection in the 95 GHz data, which suggests an optically thick source.…”
Section: Candidate Objectsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar polarization fractions were observed at every point in the light curve with signal-to-noise in flux greater than one ( Figure 6). This is consistent with emission from a small-volume synchrotron source, such as a GRB or other small jet produced in an extremely homogeneous magnetic field (Granot & Königl 2003). It is not clear, however, how this very high polarization fraction corresponds to the non-detection in the 95 GHz data, which suggests an optically thick source.…”
Section: Candidate Objectsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although it is not clear how to reconcile the 95 GHz non-detection with the 150 GHz polarization data, a plausible explanation for the 150 GHz data alone would be a nearly on-axis GRB afterglow. This would be consistent with the timescale of emission, the high degree of linear polarization, and the 90°polarization rotation coincident with the beginning of the candidate's decay (Granot & Königl 2003). The gamma-ray component of such a GRB could have been missed due to the limited observing efficiency of satellites, a small misalignment of the jet, or obscuration of the prompt high-energy component.…”
Section: Candidate Objectmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical values of p = 2−3 correspond to a polarisation of 70-75%. An ordered magnetic field of this type would not be produced in shocks but could be advected from the central engine (Granot & Königl 2003;Granot 2003;Lyutikov et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect cannot be observed in terrestrial laboratories and would provide a test of QED in extreme conditions. X-ray polarization may reveal the inner structure of the jets from gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) [22][23] [24] [25]. For high polarization fractions, the observations could establish the magnetically dominated character of the jet flow, and would constrain the process of jet formation as well as the central engine.…”
Section: Hard X-ray Polarimetry With Exist -Science Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%