2002
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.125236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
57
4
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
57
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The soft tissue facial profile can be assessed by means of standardized photographic records as well. [18][19][20][21][22][23] This method requires accurate standardization of the photographic setup; only when this is provided can both angular and linear measurements be calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soft tissue facial profile can be assessed by means of standardized photographic records as well. [18][19][20][21][22][23] This method requires accurate standardization of the photographic setup; only when this is provided can both angular and linear measurements be calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] It is not possible to evaluate the soft tissues from the frontal view by using cephalometric radiographs. In addition to cephalometric radiographs, soft tissue evaluation has been carried out by means of different methods such as anthropometry, [6][7][8][9][10] two-or threedimensional photogrammetry, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and three-dimensional imaging techniques. 24,25 Among these methods, two-dimensional photogrammetry has the advantage of being a basic, noninvasive, cost-effective, and quick method that requires minimal time and equipment in the assessment of soft tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They pointed out a problem with historical subjects used for the Divine Proportion and also reported that the general public prefers a fuller, more protrusive profile than what the customary cephalometric standards indicate. This study shows that the standards and norms for one population should not always be acceptable for another population and studies of Paula Ferna´ndez-Riveiro 3 shows that there were presence of sexual dimorphism in most parameters of the Labial, Nasal, and Chin areas. There is no study evident in literature which defines the norms or ideal proportions for the Nepalese population, Hence the purpose of this study also was to define the nasal norms for Nepalese females belonging to the three ethnic groups studied.…”
Section: Photographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological characteristics of nose are used in diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. Literature evidences on linear and angular soft tissue profile analysis shows ethnic differences [2,3].The nose is considered to contribute to this difference [4,5].Though hard tissue cephalometrics remains the back bone of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, the paradigm shift to soft tissue examination has added a new dimension to orthodontics. The soft tissue of a patient may contribute positively or negatively to facial esthetics.…”
Section: Department Of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Kathmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation