2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2013.6610652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear parameter varying identification of ankle joint intrinsic stiffness during imposed walking movements

Abstract: This paper describes a novel model structure and identification method for the time-varying, intrinsic stiffness of human ankle joint during imposed walking (IW) movements. The model structure is based on the superposition of a large signal, linear, time-invariant (LTI) model and a small signal linear-parameter varying (LPV) model. The methodology is based on a two-step algorithm; the LTI model is first estimated using data from an unperturbed IW trial. Then, the LPV model is identified using data from a pertu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10C demonstrates that the ankle static stiffness can take different values for the same ankle angle depending on the immediate history of the movement. This demonstrates a true TV behavior in the joint neuromuscular properties, and not just a static-nonlinear dependency on joint position, as has been previously assumed (Sobhani Tehrani et al, 2013 ; Jalaleddini et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 10C demonstrates that the ankle static stiffness can take different values for the same ankle angle depending on the immediate history of the movement. This demonstrates a true TV behavior in the joint neuromuscular properties, and not just a static-nonlinear dependency on joint position, as has been previously assumed (Sobhani Tehrani et al, 2013 ; Jalaleddini et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These type of models cannot provide any information regarding the modulation of reflex mechanisms and likely overestimate the contribution of intrinsic mechanisms to the overall dynamic joint stiffness. We have introduced methods to estimate intrinsic and stretch reflex mechanisms using the parallel-cascade model structure during TV conditions; however, these methods require very large data sets for parameter estimation, which severely limits their application (Giesbrecht et al, 2006 ; Ludvig et al, 2011 ; Guarin and Kearney, 2012 , 2015b ); or make the strong assumption that there is a static-nonlinear relation between the parallel-cascade model parameters and joint position or torque (Sobhani Tehrani et al, 2013 ; Jalaleddini et al, 2015 ). Despite their limitations, these studies have shown that the interpolation of parameter values obtained from stationary experiments does not describe dynamic joint stiffness during TV conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous experimental studies have revealed that ankle joint stiffness, on average, decreases with plantarflexion until 27 • plantarflexion (Sobhani Tehrani et al, 2013;Jalaleddini et al, 2015). Thus, a reduction of muscle stiffness with muscle shortening during plantarflexion might explain our results (Davidson and Charles, 2016).…”
Section: Alternative Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The second and third-order power of joint angles (θ 2 ( t ), θ 3 ( t )) were also included in the model to account for nonlinear changes of joint biomechanics as a function of joint angle (Sobhani Tehrani et al, 2013). The main assumption of the model is that the neural component of the force is negligible, which is a fair assumption as the velocity of perturbation was low enough to avoid evoking reflex responses (Jalaleddini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%