2016
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2016/18677.7741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Odontometric Analysis of Permanent Dentition as A Forensic Aid: A Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of premolars in the present study were in agreement with Babu et al (2016) and Srinivasprasad et al (2017), who found that the first premolars dimensions had significant degree of sexual dimorphism. On the other hand Kailash et al (2018) found that there was statistical significant difference in BL and MD dimensions of the left first, right second and left second premolars between males and females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of premolars in the present study were in agreement with Babu et al (2016) and Srinivasprasad et al (2017), who found that the first premolars dimensions had significant degree of sexual dimorphism. On the other hand Kailash et al (2018) found that there was statistical significant difference in BL and MD dimensions of the left first, right second and left second premolars between males and females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Lateral incisor results of the current study were in agreement with Kailash et al (2018) who detected statistical significance differences in BL and MD dimensions of the left and right lateral incisors. In contrast, Babu et al (2016) and Srinivasprasad et al (2017) found that lateral incisor dimensions didn't show any statistical significant differences between males and females. 2013founded that there was statistical significant differences between males and females in MD and BL dimensions of canines, which correlates with the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In our study, maxillary first molar both right and left sides and maxillary right second molar showed significant value for both the BL and MD dimensions which is similar to the study conducted by Deo[ 3 ] and Babu et al . [ 24 ] in contrast with the study done by Lakhanpal et al . [ 22 ] where only MD dimension showed a significant difference, this may be due to less sample size (50 M and 50 F) in their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Statistical significance was observed in maxillary right and left central incisor, right second premolar, left first and second premolars, and left first and second molars which is in contrast to studies done by Babu et al . [ 24 ] and Srinivasprasad et al . [ 23 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually pre-molar are about 7 mm wide, but average molars are about 10 mm wide (Fig. 8) [21]. Thus, special attention in positioning the curing light is encouraged when light curing proximal boxes in Class II restorations, as well as two light curing procedures in each end (mesial and distal) while using bulk fill composites in Class II restorations (…”
Section: Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%