2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4793726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear mode conversion of Langmuir/z-mode waves to radiation: Scalings of conversion efficiencies and propagation angles with temperature and magnetic field orientation

Abstract: Linear mode conversion (LMC) is the linear transfer of energy from one wave mode to another in an inhomogeneous plasma. It is relevant to laboratory plasmas and multiple solar system radio emissions, such as continuum radiation from planetary magnetospheres and type II and III radio bursts from the solar corona and solar wind. This paper simulates LMC of waves defined by warm, magnetized fluid theory, specifically the conversion of Langmuir/z-mode waves to electromagnetic (EM) radiation. The primary focus is t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that type III bursts are produced by quasi‐linear and nonlinear processes involved in plasma emission [e.g., Melrose , ; Cairns , , ; Bastian et al , ; Robinson and Cairns , ]. Other mechanisms such as linear mode conversion [ Kim et al , ; Schleyer et al , ], antenna radiation from Langmuir eigenmodes [ Malaspina et al , , ], and nongyrotropic beam‐driven emission [ Tsiklauri , ; Pechhacker and Tsiklauri , , ] are assumed to be less important and are not included. The injection of energetic electrons produced during a flare onto an open magnetic field line embedded in a plasma whose waves are treated using unmagnetized theory is represented by adding a source term G to the quasi‐linear electron transport equation [e.g., Li et al , , ]: fe∂t+v0.3emfe∂x=∂v(Afe)+∂v()0.3emD0.3emfe∂v0.3em+G(t,x,v), where G(t,x,v)=Finjπ0.3emδtI(v)0.3em0.3emexp[](tt0)2(δt)2(xx0)2(δx)20.3em. Here f e = f e ( t , x , v ) is the electron distribution function at time t and radial distance x = r − R ⊙ above the photosphere ( r = R ⊙ ), v is the electron speed, and f e is normalized to the plasma density n e .…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume that type III bursts are produced by quasi‐linear and nonlinear processes involved in plasma emission [e.g., Melrose , ; Cairns , , ; Bastian et al , ; Robinson and Cairns , ]. Other mechanisms such as linear mode conversion [ Kim et al , ; Schleyer et al , ], antenna radiation from Langmuir eigenmodes [ Malaspina et al , , ], and nongyrotropic beam‐driven emission [ Tsiklauri , ; Pechhacker and Tsiklauri , , ] are assumed to be less important and are not included. The injection of energetic electrons produced during a flare onto an open magnetic field line embedded in a plasma whose waves are treated using unmagnetized theory is represented by adding a source term G to the quasi‐linear electron transport equation [e.g., Li et al , , ]: fe∂t+v0.3emfe∂x=∂v(Afe)+∂v()0.3emD0.3emfe∂v0.3em+G(t,x,v), where G(t,x,v)=Finjπ0.3emδtI(v)0.3em0.3emexp[](tt0)2(δt)2(xx0)2(δx)20.3em. Here f e = f e ( t , x , v ) is the electron distribution function at time t and radial distance x = r − R ⊙ above the photosphere ( r = R ⊙ ), v is the electron speed, and f e is normalized to the plasma density n e .…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] We assume that type III bursts are produced by quasilinear and nonlinear processes involved in plasma emission [e.g., Melrose, 1980;Cairns, 1987aCairns, , 1987bBastian et al, 1998;Robinson and Cairns, 1998a]. Other mechanisms such as linear mode conversion [Kim et al, 2008;Schleyer et al, 2013], antenna radiation from Langmuir eigenmodes [Malaspina et al, 2010[Malaspina et al, , 2012, and nongyrotropic beamdriven emission [Tsiklauri, 2011;Tsiklauri, 2012a, 2012b] are assumed to be less important and are not included. The injection of energetic electrons produced during a flare onto an open magnetic field line embedded in a plasma whose waves are treated using unmagnetized theory is represented by adding a source term G to the quasi-linear electron transport equation [e.g., Li et al, 2003Li et al, , 2011a:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the density decreases with the distance to the Sun, the plasma frequency decreases, and the type III exhibits their characteristic time-frequency drift. Several wave conversion processes have been discussed from linear mode conversion in inhomogeneous density profiles [Field, 1956;Kim et al, 2008;Schleyer et al, 2013] to nonlinear processes including nonlinear beam instability [Yoon, 1995], wave coupling (electrostatic parametric decay [Cairns, 1987b;Henri et al, 2009], or electromagnetic coupling [Cairns, 1987a]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous analytical and numerical studies of LMC have targeted the conversion of Langmuir/ z mode waves to electromagnetic (EM) free‐space radiation. The mode conversion efficiencies, the fraction of energy or power transferred from one wave mode to another, depend upon a range of parameters including the incoming wave vector k ES [ Forslund et al , ; Mjolhus , ; Budden , ; Willes and Cairns , ], the orientation and length scale of the density gradient ∇ N 0 [ Forslund et al , ; Budden , ; Hinkel‐Lipsker et al , ; Willes and Cairns , ; Schleyer et al , ], the ambient magnetic field strength and orientation B 0 [ Yin et al , ; Kim et al , , , ; Schleyer et al , ], and the plasma temperature T e [ Forslund et al , ; Cairns and Willes , ; Kim et al , , ; Schleyer et al , ]. They also depend weakly on the functional form of the monotonic density profile [ Hinkel‐Lipsker et al , ; Forslund et al , ; Willes and Cairns , ] and random density fluctuations [ Yu and Kim , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Schleyer et al [] performed simulations of LMC for Langmuir/ z mode and EM waves under arbitrary orientations of the density gradient ∇ N 0 . They found that the energy conversion efficiencies depend on γ β and also that both the energy and power conversion efficiencies depend on the angle between ∇ N 0 and B 0 ; however, Kim et al [] found that for sufficiently weak magnetized plasmas, the power conversion efficiency may be independent of the angle between ∇ N 0 and B 0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%