2018
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear mixed models for association analysis of quantitative traits with next‐generation sequencing data

Abstract: We develop linear mixed models (LMMs) and functional linear mixed models (FLMMs) for gene‐based tests of association between a quantitative trait and genetic variants on pedigrees. The effects of a major gene are modeled as a fixed effect, the contributions of polygenes are modeled as a random effect, and the correlations of pedigree members are modeled via inbreeding/kinship coefficients. F‐statistics and χ 2 likelihood ratio test (LRT) statistics based on the LMMs and FLMMs are constructed to test for asso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly different from the existing functional genetic analysis, such as Y. Li et al (2022) and Chiu et al (2018), we explore multiple structures of SNP data, including the group structure, bi-level sparsity, and group-level network structure. This allows the proposed analysis to more accurately and more deeply describe disease biology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significantly different from the existing functional genetic analysis, such as Y. Li et al (2022) and Chiu et al (2018), we explore multiple structures of SNP data, including the group structure, bi-level sparsity, and group-level network structure. This allows the proposed analysis to more accurately and more deeply describe disease biology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional analysis has been successful in GWAS because it can naturally capture linkage and linkage disequilibrium of genetic variations. Recent methodological developments are often based on statistical tests, including the fixed effect functional linear models with F ‐distributed tests (Fan et al., 2013), functional U ‐statistic method (Jadhav et al., 2017), functional linear mixture models with a likelihood ratio test (Chiu et al., 2018), and others. Different from the testing framework, Y. Li et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-known examples include Hotelling’s T 2 statistic ( Fan & Knapp, 2003 ), genomic-distance based regression ( Wessel and Schork, 2006 ), variance component (VC) or kernel machine regression based tests ( Tzeng and Zhang 2007 ; Pan 2009 ; Wu et al, 2010 ; Wu et al, 2011 ), the use of weighted genetic risk scores ( Li et al, 2009 ; Iribarren et al, 2018 ), and the C-alpha test ( Neale et al, 2011 ). These tests have also been extended using the framework of functional or mixed effects models ( Fan et al, 2013 ; Chen et al, 2019 ; Chiu et al, 2019 ). In the third group, each test assesses associations between the phenotype variable and some form of aggregated genotype data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For gene‐based analysis of sequencing data which contain a large number of rare variants, the available methods can only analyze univariate traits (Chein et al, 2017; Chen et al, 2014; Chiu, Yuan, et al, 2019; Chiu, Zhang, et al, 2019; Fan, Wang, Qi, et al, 2016). To analyze univariate survival traits, Fan, Wang, Qi, et al (2016) has developed gene‐based Cox models and related test statistics to analyze the sequencing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%