2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02879979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear estimate of the number of zeros of Abelian integrals for quadratic centers having almost all their orbits formed by cubics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The list of quadratic center at (0,0), almost all the orbits of which are cubic, looks as follows [9,21]: with the integrating factor µ(x, y) = x −4 . In the present paper, by using the Picard-Fuchs equation and the property of Chebyshev space, we investigate the number of limit cycles of system (1.2) under discontinuous polynomial perturbations of degree n. The system (1.2) has a center (1,0) and h = −1 corresponds to the center (1,0).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The list of quadratic center at (0,0), almost all the orbits of which are cubic, looks as follows [9,21]: with the integrating factor µ(x, y) = x −4 . In the present paper, by using the Picard-Fuchs equation and the property of Chebyshev space, we investigate the number of limit cycles of system (1.2) under discontinuous polynomial perturbations of degree n. The system (1.2) has a center (1,0) and h = −1 corresponds to the center (1,0).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) If h ∈ (−1, 0), a + i,j = a − i,j and b + i,j = b − i,j , then Zhao et al [21] obtained that the number of limit cycles of system (1.4) bifurcating from the period annulus is not more than 3n − 4 for n ≥ 4; 8 for n = 3; 5 for n = 2 (counting multiplicity).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof of Lemma 5.1 is similar to that of Proposition 2.1 in [12], so we omit it. By similar arguments to Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2, we obtain the following lemmas.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the paper [52], we have shown that J −1 (h), J 0 (h), associated with system (1.8), satisfy the following Picard-Fuchs equation, provided A = −2:…”
Section: Corollary 22mentioning
confidence: 97%