2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01978-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear dose response of acrocentric chromosome associations to gamma irradiation in human lymphocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A dose-dependent increase in the number of cells exhibiting more than one DC formations was observed, with the notable nding that no instances of cells with two or more DC formations were observed up to 0.5 Gy, consistent with manual scoring observations. Statistical analysis con rmed a Poisson distribution for DC occurrences across all doses, consistent with earlier reports [10,11,23,33,34]. The dispersion index (u) and relative variance (σ²/Y) were calculated for each dose points, following the guidelines provided by the IAEA (Table 2) [24].…”
Section: Establishment Of Dose Response Curve For 60 Co-γ-ray Induced...supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A dose-dependent increase in the number of cells exhibiting more than one DC formations was observed, with the notable nding that no instances of cells with two or more DC formations were observed up to 0.5 Gy, consistent with manual scoring observations. Statistical analysis con rmed a Poisson distribution for DC occurrences across all doses, consistent with earlier reports [10,11,23,33,34]. The dispersion index (u) and relative variance (σ²/Y) were calculated for each dose points, following the guidelines provided by the IAEA (Table 2) [24].…”
Section: Establishment Of Dose Response Curve For 60 Co-γ-ray Induced...supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The establishment of a precise calibration curve is crucial for accurate dose estimation [9]. This involves constructing a prede ned dose-response curve, where the occurrence of chromosomal aberrations correlates with radiation dose, typically described by linear-quadratic equations for low Linear Energy Transfer (LET) radiation and linear equations for high LET radiation [10]. It is imperative that the standard used for calibration matches or closely resembles the radiation quality of the speci c incident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose response relationship at acute dose radiation exposures above 100 mGy mostly remains linear in human lymphocytes using chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei and γH2AX foci analysis [ 35 38 ]. However, the shape of the dose response curve at chronic low dose exposures below 100 mGy is found to be non-linear in human lymphocytes using various DNA damage endpoints [ 29 , 43 – 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extrapolation of risk from at high doses to low doses assumes that stochastic health effects and DNA damage at high and low doses are similar and the dose response is linear. It has been found that the induction of DNA DSBs may not always show a linear dose response due to IR exposure [ 35 38 ]. Although at high doses of IR exposure biological end points show linear dose response, but at low doses, it is not always linear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%