2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000400012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear density analysis of bone repair in rats using digital direct radiograph

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess bone density measurements for analysis of repairing fractures in rats using direct digital radiography under Dexamethasone effects. Thirty (30) young adult male Wistar rats were used, with an average weight of 200g, which were submitted to general anesthetics by ethyl ether. One rib of each animal was fractured by surgical technique. The rats were divided into 2 groups, named Control group - intraperitoneal administration of saline solution 1 hour prior to operation, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Teixeira et al (2011) also used the radiographic pixel analysis to confirm the presence and intensity of bone resorption in rat’s mandible, observed in a histological section, via histogram tool by establishing pixel values of the ROIs, overcoming a conventional visual analysis. Also, results by Shrout et al, 2003 , Jett et al, 2004 , Bozzo et al, 2004 , and Goes et al (2010) also confirmed the possibility of bone loss detection by analyzing pixel values or density, even if it was not yet visible radiographically, corroborating our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The study by Teixeira et al (2011) also used the radiographic pixel analysis to confirm the presence and intensity of bone resorption in rat’s mandible, observed in a histological section, via histogram tool by establishing pixel values of the ROIs, overcoming a conventional visual analysis. Also, results by Shrout et al, 2003 , Jett et al, 2004 , Bozzo et al, 2004 , and Goes et al (2010) also confirmed the possibility of bone loss detection by analyzing pixel values or density, even if it was not yet visible radiographically, corroborating our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[ 38 ] According to Bozzo et al., intraperitoneal administration of DEX 0.1 mg Kg −1 of weight 1 h prior to operation, and two postoperative doses every 12 h repairing fractures in rats. [ 39 ] After calculation, the DEX loading and capacity of ZIF‐8 nanoparticles could meet the requirement for systemic administration of DEX. Furthermore, DEX@ZIF‐8/SCM nanoparticles were mostly locally injected to the defect area, thus, the release content of DEX from nanoparticles could be enough for bone repair.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These animals were then divided into six separate groups, each labelled as A, B, C, D, E and F. Before the commencement of the study, the animals were individually weighed; the average weight was 200 ± 20 g. The initial phase involved the induction of osteoporosis in groups B, C, D, E, and F using Dexona (dexamethasone sodium phosphate) at a dosage of 2 mg/kg body weight (Zydus Alidac, Bangalore, India, 2 mg/mL) via subcutaneous injection once weekly for a duration of 4 weeks [ 23 ]. The subjects were allowed to remain undisturbed for six weeks, during which osteoporosis development was observed [ 24 ]. Group A was designated as the control group, while Group B was designated as the pathogenic control group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%