1995
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.64.1311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear and Nonlinear Susceptibilities of Ferromagnetic Fine Particles in Cu97Co3Alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
80
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) the function W has a parametric dependency on the vector n so that, in fact, the angular argument of W is (e · n). The magnetodynamic equation underlying the Brown kinetic equation (2) can be either that by Landau & Lifshitz or that by Gilbert. To be specific, we adopt the former one.…”
Section: Superparamagnetic Relaxation Times a Uniaxially Anisotrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) the function W has a parametric dependency on the vector n so that, in fact, the angular argument of W is (e · n). The magnetodynamic equation underlying the Brown kinetic equation (2) can be either that by Landau & Lifshitz or that by Gilbert. To be specific, we adopt the former one.…”
Section: Superparamagnetic Relaxation Times a Uniaxially Anisotrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since recently, this approach (it originates from the spin glass science) became quite feasible in experimental realization. [2] However, to benefit from it, one needs an adequate model. Surprisingly, until nowadays the Néel [1] concept of superparamagnetic behavior of fine magnetic particles that had been substantially advanced by Brown [3,4] and refined by numerous researchers (see the review article [5] with about 400 references), lacks a nonlinear extension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have investigated the similarities and differences of superparamagnetic clusters compared to a spin-glass system. 12,13 However, these studies were not able to vary independently the cluster concentration and diameter. This limitation, resulting from the sample-preparation method, makes it difficult to measure the concentration/cluster volume regime where such a system goes from being superparamagnetic clusters to a more collective or interactive system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the calculations, we have also assumed that all the particles are identical; in order to account for polydispersity, one must average ͑ ͒ over the appropriate distribution function ͑e.g., over the particle volumes; see for details Refs. 25 …”
Section: ͑8͒mentioning
confidence: 99%