2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2013.08.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear algebraic representation for topological structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Linear Algebraic Representation (LAR) scheme [14], uses Combinatorial Cellular Complexes (CCC) as its mathematical domain [5], and various compressed representations of sparse matrices [11] as its codomain.…”
Section: Linear Algebraic Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Linear Algebraic Representation (LAR) scheme [14], uses Combinatorial Cellular Complexes (CCC) as its mathematical domain [5], and various compressed representations of sparse matrices [11] as its codomain.…”
Section: Linear Algebraic Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a contribution to these efforts, we present here a novel representation scheme [14] which unifies the treatment of images, meshes and polyhedral data, and requires the minimum amount of storage for a complete representation of their topology and geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear algebraic mesh representation that bears some similarity to our approach is presented in a technical note by DiCarlo et al [DPS14]. They store characteristic matrices that map each k-face (see Section 3) to the unordered vertices as a binary compressed sparse row (CSR) matrix.…”
Section: Array-based Volumetric Mesh Data Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three structures were selected: the coupling-entity [21,22], the radial-edge [14], and the partial-entity [10]. There are also new data structures for non-manifold modelling developed recently [23][24][25][26] but they are based on the older data structures [4,10,14,21,27,28] or else a direct comparison is difficult: they introduce many construction entities stored explicitly, like regions, shells, faces, edges, vertices, loops, disks, etc.-while there are only edges and vertices in the DHE models, similar to the feather introduced in the coupling-entity data structure.…”
Section: Comparisons With the Dhementioning
confidence: 99%