2006
DOI: 10.1126/science.1132690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lineages of Acidophilic Archaea Revealed by Community Genomic Analysis

Abstract: Novel, low-abundance microbial species can be easily overlooked in standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based surveys. We used community genomic data obtained without PCR or cultivation to reconstruct DNA fragments bearing unusual 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and protein-coding genes from organisms belonging to novel archaeal lineages. The organisms are minor components of all biofilms growing in pH 0.5 to 1.5 solutions within the Richmond Mine, California. Probes specific for 16S rRNA showed that the fraction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
174
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further detected a singleton crenarchaeal clone from Berrocal site 2 (BE2) related to an archaeal sequence from a subsurface acid-mine drainage system (99% similar to AY082452). We also recovered several euryarchaeal sequences from AG and OR stations that clustered with nanoarchaea (89% similarity to AY652726) reported from Iron Mountain, CA, USA (Baker et al, 2006). Baker et al argued that the discovery of their novel nanoarchaea was due to their metagenomic approach and cited the use of traditional primers covering a larger portion of the gene as the cause for failed amplification attempts in the past.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We further detected a singleton crenarchaeal clone from Berrocal site 2 (BE2) related to an archaeal sequence from a subsurface acid-mine drainage system (99% similar to AY082452). We also recovered several euryarchaeal sequences from AG and OR stations that clustered with nanoarchaea (89% similarity to AY652726) reported from Iron Mountain, CA, USA (Baker et al, 2006). Baker et al argued that the discovery of their novel nanoarchaea was due to their metagenomic approach and cited the use of traditional primers covering a larger portion of the gene as the cause for failed amplification attempts in the past.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We were therefore surprised to discover Cas9 proteins encoded in genomes of the nanoarchaea ARMAN-1 (Candidatus Micrarchaeum acidiphilum ARMAN-1) and ARMAN-4 (Candidatus Parvarchaeum acidiphilum ARMAN-4) 12,13 in acid-mine drainage (AMD) metagenomic datasets (Extended Data Table 1 and Extended Data Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, cryo-electron tomographic reconstructions often identified viral particles attached to ARMAN cells 12,14 . ARMAN-1 protospacers also derived from a putative transposon within the genome of ARMAN-2 (another nanoarchaeon 13 ) and a putative mobile element in the genomes of Thermoplasmatales archaea, including that of I-plasma 15 from the same ecosystem (Extended Data Fig. 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General archaea primers failed to amplify an archaeal 16S rRNA gene signal. By contrary, primers deduced Ecological niches of acidophilic microorganisms S Ziegler et al from the archaeal probe ARCH915 combined with a universal primer and specific primers for the recently discovered ARMAN-enabled PCR product formation (Supplementary Table S2) (Baker et al, 2006). Sequence analysis revealed the presence of clones most closely related to the ARMAN species described by Baker et al (2006) as well as clones belonging to the Thermoplasmatales.…”
Section: Microorganisms In the Biofilmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, novel archaea, called ARMAN (Archaeal Richmond Mine Acidophilic Nanoorganism) were recently discovered by shotgun sequencing of specimens that were sampled at the Iron Mountain Superfund Site in California. They belong to deeply branching lineages that were not found previously owing to mismatches of the hitherto believed universal archaea primer sets (Baker et al, 2006). Using metagenomic and proteomic data, it was assumed that these novel archaea are aerobic chemoheterotrophs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%