Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.22.5.050502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line-scan focal modulation microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem can be alleviated by introducing additional background rejection mechanisms beyond spatial filtering provided by confocal detection [41][42][43]. For example, focal modulation has been demonstrated to be very effective in suppressing scattering induced background in visible light confocal microscopy [44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem can be alleviated by introducing additional background rejection mechanisms beyond spatial filtering provided by confocal detection [41][42][43]. For example, focal modulation has been demonstrated to be very effective in suppressing scattering induced background in visible light confocal microscopy [44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising given the numerous advantages it offers including cellular (i.e., micron-level) axial resolution, noninvasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to be incorporated into catheters [2] and endoscopes [3]. Unlike many other microscopic methods such as fluorescence microscopy [4], OCT does not require exogenous labeling for visualizing biological structures. Recently there has been a growing interest in applying OCT to pre-clinical studies that involve various small animal models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, an intensity-modulated fluorescence signal at 1.7 MHz was detected in the experiment. 13 In the setup, a dichroic mirror separated the exciting laser beam and the fluorescent emission beam. The diameter of the pinhole aperture at 25 μm was chosen to match the objective lens O 1 (Olympus, LMPLFL 100X, NA ¼ 0.8, WD ¼ 3.4 mm) and the collector lens O 2 (Lightpath Gradium lenses, EFL ¼ 60 mm, f∕# ¼ 2.6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%