1978
DOI: 10.1177/001872087802000507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line Criteria in Target Acquisition with Television

Abstract: This paper presents a review of experimental data from tests of target acquisition with electro-optical, raster scan systems. These data, as well as equipment parameters such as sensor field of view, system line number, display size, and target size on the display, can be used to estimate target acquisition performance by system operators. The paper lists the equations required to make such performance estimations, and several examples are given. The procedure can be used to compute equipment characteristics r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He estimated that his system had a ratio of 1.5 scan lines per resolution line, or 3 per line pair, and stated that using this conversion ratio, his results were comparable to Johnson's work in 1974. [29] In 1978, Lawson, Cassidy, and Ratches developed a time dependent model of search, in which the probability of detection could be characterized by the amount of time an observer had looking at the field, as well as a function of resolved cycles. This differed from the static approach, where observers had essentially unlimited time to detect and perform a discrimination task.…”
Section: Extension Of the Johnson Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He estimated that his system had a ratio of 1.5 scan lines per resolution line, or 3 per line pair, and stated that using this conversion ratio, his results were comparable to Johnson's work in 1974. [29] In 1978, Lawson, Cassidy, and Ratches developed a time dependent model of search, in which the probability of detection could be characterized by the amount of time an observer had looking at the field, as well as a function of resolved cycles. This differed from the static approach, where observers had essentially unlimited time to detect and perform a discrimination task.…”
Section: Extension Of the Johnson Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much is known about resolution in terms of TV raster lines and target detection, recognition, and identification (e.g., Erickson, 1978;Goble, Williams, Pratt, Wald, Rubin, & Hanson, 1980;Meister, 1984).…”
Section: Introduction Target Identification Performance: the Effects mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When classification range and accuracy were used as indices of performance, the variables yielding statistically significant effects were ship type, ship orientation, and display contrast. Erickson (1978) has provided procedures which can be used to estimate equipment requirements needed to achieve various target acquisition performance levels for systems presenting television pictures to human operators. As Erickson pointed out, there are limitations to those procedures, which are principally due to individual system requirements and to boundaries on our understanding of many real-world visual-search processes, boundaries resulting from the relative isolation in which important independent variables are examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%