2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.18.064056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lindblad Tomography of a Superconducting Quantum Processor

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an improvement, gate set tomography [13], [15]- [17] takes into account of the actual SPAM noise to better characterize the noise mechanism of the gate set. The recently proposed Lindblad tomography (LT) [18] also employs the SPAM error and several assumptions (Markov channel, constant SPAM error and perfect single qubit gate) and estimates the Hamiltonian and Lindbladian operator. Ref.…”
Section: B Gate Set Tomography (Gst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an improvement, gate set tomography [13], [15]- [17] takes into account of the actual SPAM noise to better characterize the noise mechanism of the gate set. The recently proposed Lindblad tomography (LT) [18] also employs the SPAM error and several assumptions (Markov channel, constant SPAM error and perfect single qubit gate) and estimates the Hamiltonian and Lindbladian operator. Ref.…”
Section: B Gate Set Tomography (Gst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [18] demonstrated that crosstalk resources in a quantum superconducting processor can be identified through LT.…”
Section: B Gate Set Tomography (Gst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these are significant contributions to the research and development of NISQ devices, there is not sufficient explanation for the deviation from a Markov model to describe the qubit dynamics. This creates a void in current research which this paper is intended to address, following the inspiration of Lindblad tomography by Samach et al 23 , by applying Markovian models to benchmarking algorithms in modern NISQ devices to evaluate the various claims about their dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in NMR, the dominant noise process is decoherence, in tunable quantum simulators such as superconducting qubits, trapped ions or cold atoms in optical lattices, state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors, as we also demonstrate here, play a central role. Initial steps at characterizing such errors as well as the dissipative Lindblad dynamics for up to two qubits in a superconducting qubit platform have been taken recently [49,50]. Hamiltonian learning of thermal states has recently also been applied in many-body experiments as a means to characterize the entanglement of up to 20-qubit subsystems whose reduced states are parameterized by the so-called entanglement Hamiltonian [51][52][53].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%