2010
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linaclotide Improves Abdominal Pain and Bowel Habits in a Phase IIb Study of Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
192
2
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
192
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Despite the different impact on colorectal sensatory mechanisms, 19,[21][22][23] linaclotide, lubiprostone and tegaserod similarly alleviated chronic pain ratings in IBS-C and constipation. [9][10][11][24][25][26] The relationship between improved bowel patterns and decreased discomfort, as highlighted by our meta-analysis, does not establish an underlying mechanism, but fits into a larger context of past experimental and clinical data. As mentioned above, loperamide reduced bowel frequency in healthy volunteers to a degree sufficient to trigger symptoms consistent with IBS-C. 29 While few comparative effectiveness analyses of active agents are available, the limited evidence does not support superiority of more recently developed agents with polyethylene glycol (PEG) being either superior or equivalent to tegaserod.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…22 Despite the different impact on colorectal sensatory mechanisms, 19,[21][22][23] linaclotide, lubiprostone and tegaserod similarly alleviated chronic pain ratings in IBS-C and constipation. [9][10][11][24][25][26] The relationship between improved bowel patterns and decreased discomfort, as highlighted by our meta-analysis, does not establish an underlying mechanism, but fits into a larger context of past experimental and clinical data. As mentioned above, loperamide reduced bowel frequency in healthy volunteers to a degree sufficient to trigger symptoms consistent with IBS-C. 29 While few comparative effectiveness analyses of active agents are available, the limited evidence does not support superiority of more recently developed agents with polyethylene glycol (PEG) being either superior or equivalent to tegaserod.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Considering the defining role of pain and discomfort in IBS-C, a paradigm is evolving, which first examines efficacy in patients with chronic constipation, followed by trials in patients with IBS-C, which require more comprehensive assessments that demonstrate improvement beyond changes in bowel patterns. [9][10][11][12][13] The results of the newer studies demonstrated lower pain ratings during treatment and prompted speculations about specific analgesic effects of these agents, potentially differentiating them from more conventional laxatives, a feature that has been particularly highlighted in reviews and advertising campaigns. 14,15 Based largely on their impact on abdominal pain, the recently introduced pro-secretory agents (lubiprostone and linaclotide) were approved in the United States not only for the treatment of chronic constipation, but also specifically for the management of IBS-C, with marketing campaigns emphasizing their presumably unique benefits related to pain relief.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2010 the results of a randomized phase IIb, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial were published [Johnston et al 2010]. This was a multicentre study conducted in the United States and Canada, recruiting 420 patients with IBS-C as defined by the ROME II criteria.…”
Section: Phase Iib Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in intracellular cGMP within intestinal epithelial cells activates CFTR, increasing the secretion of Cl -and HCO 3 -into the lumen, increasing the rate of plasmalumen water flux thereby increasing stool volume [3][4][5] in a mechanism identical to the diarrhea associated with In contrast to lubiprostone [6], linaclotide may stimulate motor activity [7]; lubiprostone, but not linaclotide, augments epithelial barrier resistance [8]. In IBS-C, linaclotide but not lubiprostone affects abdominal pain apparently independently of stool frequency [9], perhaps due to the effects of cGMP on visceral sensory afferents [10,11]. The combination of an acceleration of colonic transit with its visceral analgesic effect and increased stool volume bodes well for the clinical impact of linaclotide and related compounds in IBS-C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%