Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases of melanoma. Patients and Methods: From 1994 to 2001, 25 patients presenting with 61 metastases of cutaneous melanoma were treated with radiosurgery. Median age was 47 years (range: 25–73 years) and median Karnofski performance status 80 (range: 50–100). Twenty patients had one radiosurgery, 5 had two or three. Median metastasis diameter was 21 mm (range: 6–54.4 mm), and median metastasis volume was… Show more
“…Over the past decade, radiosurgery has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment modality for patients with melanoma metastases to the brain [2,3,13,15,[30][31][32][33][34] . Given the poor local control associated with conventional external beam irradiation as well as their relative vascularity that leads to more diffi cult open surgical intervention, this study was intended to answer the question whether or not single-fraction radiosurgery would be equally effi cacious for melanoma metastases to the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose was prescribed to the 80% isodose line, which covered the planning treatment volume in all cases. Tumor volume ranged from 4.1 to 153 cm 3 ). There were no complications associated with the fi ducial placement in this series.…”
Section: Overview Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment plans were designed to treat the tumor with a prescribed dose of 18 Gy that was calculated to the 80% isodose line; the maximum tumor dose was 22.5 Gy. For the T3 lesion, the tumor volume was 16.8 cm 3 and the spinal cord received a maximum dose of 10 Gy. For the L2 lesion, the tumor volume was 46.5 cm 3 and the cauda equina received a maximum dose of 10 Gy.…”
Section: Illustrative Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical studies have described a signifi cant benefi t of stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases specifi cally from melanoma over conventional whole-brain fractionated external beam radiotherapy [2,3,13,15,[30][31][32][33][34] . Other researchers have also shown the feasibility and clinical effi cacy of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases [21,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][35][36][37] .…”
Background: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in treating metastatic melanoma involving the spine has previously been limited. Conventional external beam radiotherapy lacks the precision to allow delivery of large single-fraction doses of radiation and simultaneously to limit the dose delivered to radiosensitive structures such as the spinal cord. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of radiosurgery for the treatment of melanoma spinal metastases in 28 patients.Methods: Thirty-six melanoma spine metastases were treated with a single-session radiosurgery technique (1 cervical, 11 thoracic, 13 lumbar, and 11 sacral) with a follow-up period of 3–43 months (median 13 months). Tumor volume ranged from 4.1 to 153 cm3 (mean 47.6 cm3). Twenty-three of the 36 lesions had received prior external beam irradiation. Results: Maximum tumor dose was maintained at 17.5–25 Gy (mean 21.7 Gy). Spinal cord volume receiving >8 Gy ranged from 0.0 to 0.7 cm3 (mean 0.26 cm3); spinal canal volume at the cauda equina level receiving >8 Gy ranged from 0.0 to 3.5 cm3 (mean 0.98 cm3). No radiation-induced toxicity occurred during the follow-up period. Axial and radicular pain improved in 27 of 28 patients (96%) who were treated primarily for pain. Long-term tumor control was seen in 3 of 4 cases treated primarily for radiographic tumor progression. Two patients went on to require open surgical intervention for tumor progression resulting in neurological deficit. Conclusions: Spinal radiosurgery offers a therapeutic modality for the safe delivery of large dose fractions of radiation therapy in a single fraction for the management of spinal metastases in patients with advanced melanoma that are often poorly controlled with alternative conventional external beam radiation therapy, and is successful even in patients with previously irradiated lesions.
“…Over the past decade, radiosurgery has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment modality for patients with melanoma metastases to the brain [2,3,13,15,[30][31][32][33][34] . Given the poor local control associated with conventional external beam irradiation as well as their relative vascularity that leads to more diffi cult open surgical intervention, this study was intended to answer the question whether or not single-fraction radiosurgery would be equally effi cacious for melanoma metastases to the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose was prescribed to the 80% isodose line, which covered the planning treatment volume in all cases. Tumor volume ranged from 4.1 to 153 cm 3 ). There were no complications associated with the fi ducial placement in this series.…”
Section: Overview Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment plans were designed to treat the tumor with a prescribed dose of 18 Gy that was calculated to the 80% isodose line; the maximum tumor dose was 22.5 Gy. For the T3 lesion, the tumor volume was 16.8 cm 3 and the spinal cord received a maximum dose of 10 Gy. For the L2 lesion, the tumor volume was 46.5 cm 3 and the cauda equina received a maximum dose of 10 Gy.…”
Section: Illustrative Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical studies have described a signifi cant benefi t of stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases specifi cally from melanoma over conventional whole-brain fractionated external beam radiotherapy [2,3,13,15,[30][31][32][33][34] . Other researchers have also shown the feasibility and clinical effi cacy of hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases [21,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][35][36][37] .…”
Background: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in treating metastatic melanoma involving the spine has previously been limited. Conventional external beam radiotherapy lacks the precision to allow delivery of large single-fraction doses of radiation and simultaneously to limit the dose delivered to radiosensitive structures such as the spinal cord. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of radiosurgery for the treatment of melanoma spinal metastases in 28 patients.Methods: Thirty-six melanoma spine metastases were treated with a single-session radiosurgery technique (1 cervical, 11 thoracic, 13 lumbar, and 11 sacral) with a follow-up period of 3–43 months (median 13 months). Tumor volume ranged from 4.1 to 153 cm3 (mean 47.6 cm3). Twenty-three of the 36 lesions had received prior external beam irradiation. Results: Maximum tumor dose was maintained at 17.5–25 Gy (mean 21.7 Gy). Spinal cord volume receiving >8 Gy ranged from 0.0 to 0.7 cm3 (mean 0.26 cm3); spinal canal volume at the cauda equina level receiving >8 Gy ranged from 0.0 to 3.5 cm3 (mean 0.98 cm3). No radiation-induced toxicity occurred during the follow-up period. Axial and radicular pain improved in 27 of 28 patients (96%) who were treated primarily for pain. Long-term tumor control was seen in 3 of 4 cases treated primarily for radiographic tumor progression. Two patients went on to require open surgical intervention for tumor progression resulting in neurological deficit. Conclusions: Spinal radiosurgery offers a therapeutic modality for the safe delivery of large dose fractions of radiation therapy in a single fraction for the management of spinal metastases in patients with advanced melanoma that are often poorly controlled with alternative conventional external beam radiation therapy, and is successful even in patients with previously irradiated lesions.
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] In these studies SRS has generally been limited to patients with 1 to 3 metastases, with rare series accepting patients with larger numbers of lesions. 31 We report our encouraging institutional experience, based on expanded eligibility for Linac-based SRS for patients with up to 5 brain metastases, followed by planned systemic therapy.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.