2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04295-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limno-ecological assessment of Aras River surface waters in Turkey: application of diatom indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies with rivers from different basins that were monitored using diatom indices, the TIT gave compatible results with environmental parameters and indicator species (Çelekli & Bilgi, 2019; Çelekli, Kayhan, et al, 2019; Çelekli, Lekesiz, & Yavuzatmaca, 2021). However, it has been determined that the TIT is not effective in the evaluation of water quality in the minimally disturbed rivers of the Asi, Akarçay and West Mediterrenian basins (Türkiye) studied within the scope of the project ‘Establishment of Reference Monitoring Network in Türkiye’ (Sevindik et al a, b, c; unpublished data) and in routine water quality monitoring study covering the entire Sakarya Basin (Solak et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In some studies with rivers from different basins that were monitored using diatom indices, the TIT gave compatible results with environmental parameters and indicator species (Çelekli & Bilgi, 2019; Çelekli, Kayhan, et al, 2019; Çelekli, Lekesiz, & Yavuzatmaca, 2021). However, it has been determined that the TIT is not effective in the evaluation of water quality in the minimally disturbed rivers of the Asi, Akarçay and West Mediterrenian basins (Türkiye) studied within the scope of the project ‘Establishment of Reference Monitoring Network in Türkiye’ (Sevindik et al a, b, c; unpublished data) and in routine water quality monitoring study covering the entire Sakarya Basin (Solak et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Unless chemical assessment is done regularly, it does not reflect the changes that may occur over time, as it will only give instantaneous values. For this reason, it may not provide complete information on the real conditions of aquatic ecosystems (Bere and Tundisi, 2011;Brack et al, 2019;Çelekli et al, 2019a;Charles et al, 2021). Deterioration of aquatic ecosystems is not only based on factors such as pesticides, xenobiotic, salinity, turbidity, and smell but also there are hundreds of other chemical variables (Merga et al, 2020).…”
Section: Bioassessment Of Surface Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide crucial information about the environment where they live because each taxon has different environmental optima for different pollutants of ecosystems (Stevenson and Pan, 1999;Kelly et al, 2008). Consequently, diatoms are very useful in biological monitoring studies (Martin and Reyes, 2012;Çelekli et al, 2019a). Knowing the indicator characteristics of diatom assemblages is critical for the robust inferences of the environmental conditions in monitoring programs and paleolimnological applications (Juggins and Birks, 2012).…”
Section: Diatom Assemblages As Bioindicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Turkey, Çelekli et al (2017, 2019a) have created the Trophic Index Turkey (TIT) based on data collected from 225 running water bodies from eight basins of Turkey. TIT was successfully tested in Northern Aegean, Western Mediterranean, and Aras basins, and in Gaziantep regions (Toudjani et al, 2017;Çelekli et al, 2018, 2019bÇelekli and Kapı, 2019;Çelekli and Arslanargun, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%