2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22935-0_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits on the Rate of Locally Testable Affine-Invariant Codes

Abstract: Despite its many applications, to program checking, probabilistically checkable proofs, locally testable and locally decodable codes, and cryptography, "algebraic property testing" is not wellunderstood. A significant obstacle to a better understanding, was a lack of a concrete definition that abstracted known testable algebraic properties and reflected their testability. This obstacle was removed by [Kaufman and Sudan, STOC 2008] who considered (linear) "affine-invariant properties", i.e., properties that are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove this in Section 4.1. This definition of F + and its analysis rely centrally on some of the structural understanding of affine-invariant linear codes derived in previous works [17,10,11,6,5,4]. Lemma 4.5 allows us to say that F + is almost as nice as F, roughly analogous to the way the set of degree d + q − 1 polynomials is almost as nice as the set of degree d polynomials.…”
Section: Overview Of Proof Of Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We prove this in Section 4.1. This definition of F + and its analysis rely centrally on some of the structural understanding of affine-invariant linear codes derived in previous works [17,10,11,6,5,4]. Lemma 4.5 allows us to say that F + is almost as nice as F, roughly analogous to the way the set of degree d + q − 1 polynomials is almost as nice as the set of degree d polynomials.…”
Section: Overview Of Proof Of Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as shown by Kaufman and Sudan [17] affine-invariant linear codes retain some of the "locality" properties of multivariate polynomial codes (or Reed-Muller codes), such as local testability and local decodability, that have found many applications in computational complexity. This has led to a sequence of works exploring these codes, but most of the works led to codes of smaller rate than known ones, or gave alternate understanding of known codes [10,11,6,5,4]. A recent work by Guo et al [12] however changes the picture significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sharp contrast, this question is far from being well understood in the case of testing properties of Boolean functions. In an attempt to remedy this, Sudan and several coauthors [KS08,GKS08,GKS09,BS09] have recently begun to investigate the role of invariance in property testing. The idea is that in order to be able to test if a combinatorial structure satisfies a property using very few queries to its representation, the property we are trying to test must be closed under certain transformations.…”
Section: Invariance In Testing Boolean Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is without loss of generality, as (F Q ) t is isomorphic to F Q t for all t and prime powers Q, and this preserves affine-invariance ( [BSS11]). testability is preserved.…”
Section: Affine-invariant Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rich structure of affine-invariance gives us some handle for understanding the constraints imposed by local testability. For example, although we know virtually no lower bounds for LTCs in the constant-query regime, it was shown in [BSS11] that affine-invariant LTCs for a constant number of queries cannot have constant rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%