2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.t01-1-03626.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits on radio emission from pulsar wind nebulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the new image no evidence is found, down to the noise level of our data, for the radio counterpart to either the X-ray PWN or the surrounding radio shell associated with its host SNR. There are many pulsars for which the search of radio PWNe yielded negative results (e.g., Gaensler et al 2000;Giacani et al 2009Giacani et al , 2014. In these cases, the failure to detect the nebular emission has been explained as a consequence of two main physical conditions based on either a high magnetic field that inhibits the production of synchrotron radiation at longer wavelengths or severe adiabatic losses that occur in young and energetic pulsars lying in a very low ambient density (∼0.003 cm −3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the new image no evidence is found, down to the noise level of our data, for the radio counterpart to either the X-ray PWN or the surrounding radio shell associated with its host SNR. There are many pulsars for which the search of radio PWNe yielded negative results (e.g., Gaensler et al 2000;Giacani et al 2009Giacani et al , 2014. In these cases, the failure to detect the nebular emission has been explained as a consequence of two main physical conditions based on either a high magnetic field that inhibits the production of synchrotron radiation at longer wavelengths or severe adiabatic losses that occur in young and energetic pulsars lying in a very low ambient density (∼0.003 cm −3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R99 suggested that the K3 site, a ∼ 20 mJy enhancement above the general flux in G313.6+0.3, was the radio counterpart to AX J1420.1-6049. Assuming a typical radio PWN spectral index α = −0.3, Gaensler et al (2000) note the fraction ǫ of the spin-down energy which goes into radio emission is related to the 20 cm flux density by S 20cm ≈ 3.3 × 10 6 ǫĖ 37 /(d/8kpc) 2 mJy. This suggests an efficiency ǫ ∼ 6 × 10 −6 at a distance of 8 kpc which is rather low compared to most other detected radio PWN (Frail & Scharringhausen 1997;Gaensler et al 2000), and would be even lower if the true distance is closer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, two different objects were proposed by different groups, as being 1RXS J170849-400910 IR counterpart, and there still is an open debate on which one is the AXP counterpart (Israel et al 2003b;Safi-Harb and West 2005;Durant and van Kerkwijk 2006). A diffuse (∼8 ) radio emission at 1.4 GHz was recently reported, possibly associated with the supernova remnant G346.5-0.1 (Gaensler et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%