2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.83.020305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits on preserving quantum coherence using multipulse control

Abstract: We explore the physical limits of pulsed dynamical decoupling methods for decoherence control as determined by finite timing resources. By focusing on a decohering qubit controlled by arbitrary sequences of π pulses, we establish a nonperturbative quantitative upper bound to the achievable coherence for specified maximum pulsing rate and noise spectral bandwidth. We introduce numerically optimized control "bandwidth-adapted" sequences that saturate the performance bound and show how they outperform existing se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The order of error suppression can then be quantified by the scaling of the single-axis error as a function of either the total evolution time or the minimum pulse interval. We choose the minimum pulse interval since experimentally this quantity is always lower-bounded, and plays an important role in the ultimate performance limits of UDD [31] and DD in general [32].…”
Section: A Qdd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order of error suppression can then be quantified by the scaling of the single-axis error as a function of either the total evolution time or the minimum pulse interval. We choose the minimum pulse interval since experimentally this quantity is always lower-bounded, and plays an important role in the ultimate performance limits of UDD [31] and DD in general [32].…”
Section: A Qdd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physically, however, a minimum growth condition is always imposed by the fact that the separation between any two consecutive pulses cannot be made arbitrarily small due to finite timing resources, thus t j+1 − t j > τ > 0 for all j. As shown in [6], the results established here may then be used to obtain a nonperturbative lower bound on χ {t j } , determined solely in terms of the parameter ω c τ . As an additional implication of our analysis, we find that Uhrig decoupling arises naturally as a consequence of representing certain polynomials of degree at most 2n + 1 in terms of Lagrange interpolation at the extreme points of the Chebyshev polynomials U 2n+1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition to being interesting on its own, this extension is motivated by physical applications in the context of decoherence control in open quantum systems using dynamical decoupling methods [6]. In the paradigmatic case of a single two-level quantum system undergoing pure dephasing due to coupling to a quantum bosonic environment, for instance, the residual decoherence error at a time t after the application of n ideal "spin-flip" pulses at times 0 < t 1 < t 2 < .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis assumes ideal pulses having zero width, in which case it has been shown that DD sequences can be designed to make higher-order system-bath coupling terms vanish [4,22,27]. However, such ideal, instantaneous pulses are not achievable in actual physical systems, and some researchers have considered finite-width pulses, which decouple to higher order than simple rectanglular pulses [28,29].…”
Section: Dynamical Decouplingmentioning
confidence: 99%