2001
DOI: 10.1089/152702901750265314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits on Inferring Genetic Adaptation to High Altitude in Himalayan and Andean Populations

Abstract: Many physiological and anthropological studies have investigated the unique Andean and Himalayan populations that have resided for many hundreds of generations at high altitude (HA). A nonscientific survey of the extant literature reveals a relatively liberal tradition of inferring genetic (evolutionary) adaptation to HA in these groups, often based on limited evidence and/or based on study designs insufficient to fully address the issue. In order to provide some perspective, I review relevant methodological i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale for this particular design is that traits that do not deacclimate may represent historically fixed traits in the population. This does not necessarily need to be the case because of irreversible developmental effects (Brutsaert, 2001), but nevertheless the present study has replicated this aspect of the Hochachaka et al study. Again, the present study shows no efficiency differences between highland Aymara (group 1), deacclimatized Aymara who have been in the lowlands for at least 2 months (group 6), and Aymara who have been born and raised in the lowlands (group 8).…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The rationale for this particular design is that traits that do not deacclimate may represent historically fixed traits in the population. This does not necessarily need to be the case because of irreversible developmental effects (Brutsaert, 2001), but nevertheless the present study has replicated this aspect of the Hochachaka et al study. Again, the present study shows no efficiency differences between highland Aymara (group 1), deacclimatized Aymara who have been in the lowlands for at least 2 months (group 6), and Aymara who have been born and raised in the lowlands (group 8).…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The statistical interaction between birthplace and ADMIX can be interpreted as the effect of genes, depending on lifelong exposure to HA. The inference of gene‐environment interaction would depend on whether highland‐ and lowland‐born groups were well‐matched, and on whether environmental effects were controlled, including acclimatization state and maternal effects (Brutsaert, 2001). Interestingly, a nonsignificant trend for this type of interaction was detected between birthplace and ADMIX on SpO 2 ( P < 0.1, model 9, Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the linguistic origin of a participant's parents' surnames (giving 4 surnames for analysis) can be used to infer the proportion of indigenous ancestry of that individual. While an imperfect marker (Brutsaert, ; Greksa, ), this approach has been used successfully in numerous studies of Andean populations that have aimed to relate birth characteristics to ancestry (Bennett et al, ; Gonzales et al, ; Julian et al, ; Mueller et al, ; Soria et al, ) and the association between native ancestry and surname origin in the Andes has been previously validated (Chakraborty et al, ). The four parental surnames of each individual were classified as “indigenous,” “mestizo,” (mixed) or “foreign” based on their linguistic origin using a surname dictionary complied by one of the authors (LGM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%