2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits on executive pay and stock price crash risk: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pay level of employees in SOEs in China is too high compared to private enterprises, the mobility of employees in state-owned enterprises is poor, and the degree of labor market constraints is low. Previous studies have shown that high wages are due to the excessive welfare of employees in SOEs ( Bai et al, 2019 ; Jian et al, 2020 ; Kong et al, 2020 ), an important factor in aggravating the low efficiency of SOEs and is inconsistent with the basic assumptions of the efficiency-wage theory.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pay level of employees in SOEs in China is too high compared to private enterprises, the mobility of employees in state-owned enterprises is poor, and the degree of labor market constraints is low. Previous studies have shown that high wages are due to the excessive welfare of employees in SOEs ( Bai et al, 2019 ; Jian et al, 2020 ; Kong et al, 2020 ), an important factor in aggravating the low efficiency of SOEs and is inconsistent with the basic assumptions of the efficiency-wage theory.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since the local SASACs followed up the employee compensation restriction policy in 2010, employee compensation in central and local SOEs are both limited, while private enterprises are not affected by the change in this policy. Drawing on existing studies related to the evaluation of compensation control policies ( Bai et al, 2019 ), we use SOEs as the experimental group and private enterprises as the control group in a quasi-natural experiment. A shorter sample period can minimize the interference of other factors unrelated to the pay restriction policy in the empirical setting.…”
Section: Data Variables and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to prior studies on crash risk (e.g., Jia, 2018;Ben-Nasr & Ghouma, 2018;Bai et al, 2019), this study employs three measures as dependent variables based on the weekly stock return for each firm on the current week and two weeks forward and backward estimated as residuals from using the following market model (Jin & Myers, 2006;Jia, 2018):…”
Section: Stock Price Crash Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we expect the impact of GSOP on GI to be more significant for local- The current study enhances our understanding of the factors influencing environmental performance and contributes to the literature in the following ways. First, our study adds value to the expanding body of literature on the causes and effects of GSOP (Bai et al, 2019;Jiang et al, 2021;Jiang & Zhang, 2018). Our research diverges from existing studies by specifically examining the environmental ramifications of GSOP, in contrast to the predominant focus on the economic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, one could plausibly argue that placing limitations on high‐level executive compensation could have negative effects on environmental performance. Moreover, the existing literature on restrictions on executive compensation suggests that limitations on top executives' pay can have a detrimental impact on their willingness to take risks, financial performance, corporate social responsibility (Jiang et al, 2021; Jiang & Zhang, 2018; Su et al, 2020), and the risk of a sudden drop in firms' stock prices (Bai et al, 2019). The primary focus of these studies has revolved around examining the impacts of “say‐on‐pay” policies enforced by the government (GSOP), particularly concerning economic and social consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%