1992
DOI: 10.1086/171781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits on detectability of mass loss from cool dwarfs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
3
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
64
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is within the range of mass-loss rate of MDs in the literature, 10 −15 − 10 −10 M /yr (e.g. Mullan et al 1992;Wood et al 2001;Vidotto et al 2014). It indicates that the wind from the MD could be a reasonable source for electrons.…”
Section: Source Of Electronssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This value is within the range of mass-loss rate of MDs in the literature, 10 −15 − 10 −10 M /yr (e.g. Mullan et al 1992;Wood et al 2001;Vidotto et al 2014). It indicates that the wind from the MD could be a reasonable source for electrons.…”
Section: Source Of Electronssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Flare-related mass-loss rates of (1È2) ] 10~12 M _ yr~1 were also estimated by CW. These estimates of M 0 , although considerably smaller than some earlier claims of from Ñare stars (Mullan et al 1992), are still 100 times M 0 larger than the mass-loss rate from the current Sun. It is not surprising that Ñare-related mass-loss rates from Ñare stars exceed solar rates.…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Unfortunately, no X-ray or CaII data are available that would allow an estimate ofṀ sw for GJ 842.2. However, GJ 842.2 is not a flare star, and its H α absorption (equivalent width EW H α = −0.545 Å, in Gizis et al 2002) indicates a moderate chromosphere and magnetic activity, and thus only a modest stellar wind (Mullan et al 1992, and Wargelin & Drake 2001. Hence, one can speculate that GJ 842.2 does not have a mass-loss rate larger than 20 times the solar rate and its distant cold grains are unperturbed at age 200 Myr.…”
Section: Debris Disks In Our Sample Of 32 M-dwarfsmentioning
confidence: 99%