Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
There are many widely held and often repeated misconceptions in the design of hydraulic fracture treatment. These include the design for fracture conductivity, fracture length (for which some have used terms such as "effective" or "apparent"), time of injection, and proppant injection schedule. These issues are intimately connected with the selection of proppants, fracturing fluids, and of course, the hardware for field execution. For those practitioners who have adopted Unified Fracture Design (UFD), the desired fracture geometry is not a matter of speculation. For the given reservoir permeability, drainage, and, volume of specific proppant injected, the fracture geometry is set. A design that follows UFD will maximize the post treatment productivity index. Thus, statements like "maximizing conductivity" or "maximizing effective length" are not appropriate and in fact, they are meaningless. However, there is a lot of room for improvement in design. These include the selection of a large mass of proppant or changing the proppant or using non-damaging fluids which, in this context, means damaging in the proppant pack or damaging to the formation by leak-off. We present in this paper a wide range of designs for three oil and three gas reservoirs with permeability of 0.01, 1 and 100 md, respectively. Results show the impact on the productivity index by 1) deviating from UFD design, 2) the beneficial effects of lack thereof using more of better proppant, and 3) the effect of fluid selection and their leak-off, and the resulting different kind of damage. We show which kind of damage is important and which is unimportant. We also examine the impact of the proppant injection schedule for both unrestricted and tip screen out (TSO) treatments. In the low permeability reservoirs, the selection of fluids and proppant schedule become crucial in obtaining the required fracture length. Fast ramping up of proppant is never indicated. Furthermore, leak-off damage is not important. For the high permeability reservoirs, selection of better proppants and fast ramping up of their injection are keys to the design. For the high permeability gas well, it is necessary to remedy the turbulence effects by changing the design further.
There are many widely held and often repeated misconceptions in the design of hydraulic fracture treatment. These include the design for fracture conductivity, fracture length (for which some have used terms such as "effective" or "apparent"), time of injection, and proppant injection schedule. These issues are intimately connected with the selection of proppants, fracturing fluids, and of course, the hardware for field execution. For those practitioners who have adopted Unified Fracture Design (UFD), the desired fracture geometry is not a matter of speculation. For the given reservoir permeability, drainage, and, volume of specific proppant injected, the fracture geometry is set. A design that follows UFD will maximize the post treatment productivity index. Thus, statements like "maximizing conductivity" or "maximizing effective length" are not appropriate and in fact, they are meaningless. However, there is a lot of room for improvement in design. These include the selection of a large mass of proppant or changing the proppant or using non-damaging fluids which, in this context, means damaging in the proppant pack or damaging to the formation by leak-off. We present in this paper a wide range of designs for three oil and three gas reservoirs with permeability of 0.01, 1 and 100 md, respectively. Results show the impact on the productivity index by 1) deviating from UFD design, 2) the beneficial effects of lack thereof using more of better proppant, and 3) the effect of fluid selection and their leak-off, and the resulting different kind of damage. We show which kind of damage is important and which is unimportant. We also examine the impact of the proppant injection schedule for both unrestricted and tip screen out (TSO) treatments. In the low permeability reservoirs, the selection of fluids and proppant schedule become crucial in obtaining the required fracture length. Fast ramping up of proppant is never indicated. Furthermore, leak-off damage is not important. For the high permeability reservoirs, selection of better proppants and fast ramping up of their injection are keys to the design. For the high permeability gas well, it is necessary to remedy the turbulence effects by changing the design further.
Cased-hole fracpacks (CHFP) can deliver high-rate, low-skin completions by creating a highly conductive fracture that extends beyond the perforation tunnels, bypassing near wellbore damage and preventing formation sand production. While the industry has a long history of successful CHFP applications, well performance prediction for this type of completions has remained challenged by complex geometrical (fracture geometry and orientation with respect to arbitrarily deviated wellbores) and multi-physics factors (multiphase flow, turbulence). Most fracpack modeling tools are limited to analytical and simplified reservoir simulation models, which can lead to poor accuracy in quantifying near-wellbore effects, such as non-Darcy pressure drop, particularly important for high-rate gas wells. In this paper, we propose a new mechanistic approach to incorporate the cased-hole fracpack completion with non-Darcy flow through explicitly meshed perforation tunnels, fractures and rock formation in real dimensions. The fracture is modeled by Enriched Finite Element Method (EFEM), which flexibly accounts for arbitrary fracture geometry and orientation while enabling multi-physics effects, impact of perforation/gravel packing damage and perforation-fracture communication uncertainty on deviated well productivities. The proposed approach is validated using (1) analytical and numerical models, and (2) two Gulf of Mexico (GOM) CHFP wells, one vertical and one deviated; where skins measured from step-rate tests were history-matched to longitudinal and transverse fracture models. We also introduce the concept of fracture neighborhood width to account for perforation performance relative to its alignment with fracture opening and orientation. Finally, the new approach is used to predict the deliverability of a high-rate, high-pressure gas condensate well. Non-Darcy effects, condensate banking effects, perforation gravel packing, and geological model uncertainties are included in predicting the well production.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.