2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c04325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of Solid Solution and Evolution of Crystal Morphology in (La1–xREx)FeO3 Perovskites by Low Temperature Hydrothermal Crystallization

Abstract: The crystallization of a new series of A-site substituted lanthanum ferrite materials (La 1– x RE x )FeO 3 was explored by the hydrothermal method at 240 °C, for rare earth (RE) = Nd, Sm, Gd, Ho, Er, Yb, and Y, with 0 ≤ x ≤ 1. The effect of elemental substitution on the morphological, structural, and magnetic properties of the materials was studied using high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction, ener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(121 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XRD patterns of SEr0, SEr1, SEr5, and SEr10 demonstrate that there is no new phase produced with the content of doped Er increasing, and it is distinct that the highest peak shifts to the right as the doping concentration enhances (Fig. 1), which is consistent with the research of Jia et al 38 As the smaller atomic radius Er 3+ (0.881 Å) shows, the cells of LaFeO 3 tend to shrink and the lattice spacing is reduced, causing the main peak diffraction peak to deviate at a larger angle. 39 With the increase in Er doping (from 0 to 5%), the grain size of the doped phase is smaller than that of the pure phase, whereas, as the doping amount reaches 10%, the grain size of the doping amount will increase slightly (Table S2†), which can be attributed to the lower main peak intensity of SEr10.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…XRD patterns of SEr0, SEr1, SEr5, and SEr10 demonstrate that there is no new phase produced with the content of doped Er increasing, and it is distinct that the highest peak shifts to the right as the doping concentration enhances (Fig. 1), which is consistent with the research of Jia et al 38 As the smaller atomic radius Er 3+ (0.881 Å) shows, the cells of LaFeO 3 tend to shrink and the lattice spacing is reduced, causing the main peak diffraction peak to deviate at a larger angle. 39 With the increase in Er doping (from 0 to 5%), the grain size of the doped phase is smaller than that of the pure phase, whereas, as the doping amount reaches 10%, the grain size of the doping amount will increase slightly (Table S2†), which can be attributed to the lower main peak intensity of SEr10.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As the Nd 3+ content increased, the remanent magnetization and saturation magnetization of the samples first increased then decreased. The magnetic moment and ionic radius of rare earth elements ions are the main factors affecting the saturation magnetization of the doping samples [37]. The coercivity of the samples shows an upward trend, and the main factors affecting the coercivity of the samples include magnetic anisotropy, grain size, micro strain, stress, crystal symmetry and spin-orbit coupling effect, magnetic single domain size, and impurities [31].…”
Section: Magnetic Analysis Of La1−xrxfeo3 (R = Al)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 12 shows the distribution of magnetic parameters of the sample. This may be because the Sm 3+ ions are magnetic in nature [37], and together with Fe 3+ and O 2− , generate a super-exchange interaction, which affected the net magnetic moment size of the crystals, ultimately affecting the magnetization of the samples. Figure 21 shows the hysteresis loop of the uncalcined La 1−x Sm x FeO 3 (x = 0~0.5) samples.…”
Section: Magnetic Analysis Of La1−xrxfeo3 (R = Sm)mentioning
confidence: 99%