1990
DOI: 10.1177/001872089003200104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of Fusion and Depth Judgment in Stereoscopic Color Displays

Abstract: The effective use of stereoscopic display systems is dependent, in part, on reliable data describing binocular fusion limits and the accuracy of depth discrimination for such visual display devices. These issues were addressed in three experiments, as were the effects of interocular cross talk. Results showed that limits of fusion were approximately 27.0 min arc for crossed disparity and 24.0 min arc for uncrossed disparity. Subjects were extremely accurate in distinguishing the relative distance among four gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
86
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimuli were presented on a Tektronix SGS 625 stereoscopic display system, which was coupled to the 386 with a Tektronix Stereoscopic Graphics Adapter Card SGS 100. Observers wore a pair of crossed Polaroid filters to obtain dioptic separation for depth perception (see Yeh & Silverstein, 1990, for a detailed discussion of the apparatus). When the disparity of an item assumed a nonzero value, two separate images were generated on the screen and each of them was seen by a different eye.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimuli were presented on a Tektronix SGS 625 stereoscopic display system, which was coupled to the 386 with a Tektronix Stereoscopic Graphics Adapter Card SGS 100. Observers wore a pair of crossed Polaroid filters to obtain dioptic separation for depth perception (see Yeh & Silverstein, 1990, for a detailed discussion of the apparatus). When the disparity of an item assumed a nonzero value, two separate images were generated on the screen and each of them was seen by a different eye.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without vergence movements and for brief stimulus durations, fusion limits as small as 27 min of arc for crossed and 24 min of arc for uncrossed retinal disparity are found. 37 Many factors affect the limits of fusion, including eye movements, stimulus properties, temporal modulation of retinal disparity information, exposure duration, amount of illuminance, and individual differences. The limits of fusion decrease with smaller, detailed, and stationary objects and increase with larger, moving objects and the addition of peripheral objects to the fixation object.…”
Section: Excessive Screen Disparitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limits of fusion decrease with smaller, detailed, and stationary objects and increase with larger, moving objects and the addition of peripheral objects to the fixation object. 6,18,[37][38][39][40] With longer stimulus durations and vergence eye movements, retinal disparities as large as 4.93°for crossed and 1.57°for uncrossed disparity can be brought into fusion range without diplopia. 37 However, the classical notion of Panum's fusional area has only limited applicability in establishing absolute limits for screen disparities in stereoscopic displays.…”
Section: Excessive Screen Disparitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human visual system is very sensitive to crosstalk in stereoscopic systems. A high level of ghosting causes difficulty in achieving stereoscopic fusion 6 and can cause visual discomfort. Figure 2(b) shows the appearance of a similar image artifact in the proposed system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%