2005
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of detection of SPIO at 3.0 T using T2* relaxometry

Abstract: T 2 * relaxometry for quantitative MR imaging is strongly hampered by large-scale field inhomogeneities, which lead to signal losses and an overestimation of the relaxation rate R 2 *. This is of particular importance for the sensitive detection of iron oxide contrast agent distributions. To derive an accurate measurement of T 2 *, a main field inhomogeneity correction is applied: the main field inhomogeneity is derived from multislice T 2 * relaxometry data and used as an initial value for an iterative optimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
168
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
168
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This decreases the transverse relaxation times and thus contributes to a reduction in signal intensity (18), allowing such images to be used as a direct indicator of MNP distribution. It should be noted, however, that, although conceptually feasible, quantification of R2* (i.e., 1/T2*) is potentially nonreproducible because iron deposited over multiple sessions can produce strong magnetic field susceptibility, resulting in differences in field inhomogeneity (19). In contrast, R2 maps showed the high spin-spin relaxivity of MNPs, which was linear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decreases the transverse relaxation times and thus contributes to a reduction in signal intensity (18), allowing such images to be used as a direct indicator of MNP distribution. It should be noted, however, that, although conceptually feasible, quantification of R2* (i.e., 1/T2*) is potentially nonreproducible because iron deposited over multiple sessions can produce strong magnetic field susceptibility, resulting in differences in field inhomogeneity (19). In contrast, R2 maps showed the high spin-spin relaxivity of MNPs, which was linear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This emphasizes the fact that although changes in oxygenation in tissue can be reflected as changes in the regional measured in different regions does not necessarily correlate with regional differences in tissue oxygenation. Also, a recent article demonstrated the feasibility of correcting for bulk susceptibility effects on measurements, 49 which may prove beneficial for BOLD MRI measurements. BOLD MRI is ideally suited for studying outer medullary oxygenation status and in the cortex when it becomes hypoxic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three hours after SPIO administration (or 7 days after sonication in Group 3), multiple-TE T 2 -weighted images were acquired and R 2 maps (where R 2 is the inverse of T 2 ) were generated using the images acquired using various TE values at each time point; these were used to quantify SPIO distribution in animal brains in vivo. R 2 * (i.e., 1/T 2 *) maps were not used to quantify SPIO because the magnetized nanoparticles cause strong field susceptibility and the reproducibility of such mapping is poor (22). A selfdeveloped code executed in MATLAB (Mathworks Inc.; Natick, MA, USA) was used to generate the R 2 values based on the equation SI ¼ A Â e ÀTE/T2 þ B, where SI is the signal intensity, TE is the echo time, A is the amplitude and B is the offset.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%