2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits in pyrolysis–GC–MS analysis of kerogen isolated from Archean cherts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of sulfate-reducing bacteria has been proposed by the pyrolysis fragments of the organic matter (Derenne et al 2008). However, the potential risk of post-depositional and experimental contamination has been found in the pyrolysis analysis of the isolated Archean organic matter (e.g., Bourbin et al 2012). The presence of ancient methanogenic archaea has been inferred from the fluid inclusions in the silica veins containing 13 C-depleted methane (Ueno et al 2006), although the abiotic origin of the methane has also been proposed (Sherwood-Lollar and McCollom 2006).…”
Section: Origin Of the Carbonaceous Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of sulfate-reducing bacteria has been proposed by the pyrolysis fragments of the organic matter (Derenne et al 2008). However, the potential risk of post-depositional and experimental contamination has been found in the pyrolysis analysis of the isolated Archean organic matter (e.g., Bourbin et al 2012). The presence of ancient methanogenic archaea has been inferred from the fluid inclusions in the silica veins containing 13 C-depleted methane (Ueno et al 2006), although the abiotic origin of the methane has also been proposed (Sherwood-Lollar and McCollom 2006).…”
Section: Origin Of the Carbonaceous Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical analysis of carbonaceous matter is necessary for understanding its origin and characteristics. However, the bulk analysis of isolated organic matter generally involves the potential risk of post-depositional and experimental contamination of the organic matter (e.g., Brocks et al 1999;Derenne et al 2008;Rasmussen et al 2008;Bourbin et al 2012). In situ analysis is a more reliable technique that avoids such contamination problems and extracts chemical signatures specific to individual microstructures in petrographic thin sections (e.g., House et al 2000House et al , 2013Kudryavtsev et al 2001;Ueno et al 2001;Schopf et al 2002Schopf et al , 2005Igisu et al 2006Igisu et al , 2009van Zuilen et al 2007;Wacey et al 2011;Lepot et al 2013; Williford et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular characterization of Archean CM has recently been recognized as a promising tool with which to discriminate between biotic and abiotic CM (Brocks et al , 2003 ; Marshall et al , 2007 ; Derenne et al , 2008 ). Unfortunately, in most samples, multiple sources of postdepositional CM and the extensive impact of metamorphism have resulted in the masking or elimination of molecular structures and a lack of univocal molecular biosignatures (Bourbin et al , 2012a ; French et al , 2015 ). Quantifying the degree of alteration of Archean CM was thus of prime interest in the search for molecular biosignatures in the oldest cherts on Earth (Marshall et al , 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method can potentially be used to resolve the biogenicity of data already in hand. An important example is the 3.5 Ga Apex chert from the Pilbara Craton in Western Australia, whose purported biogenicity has evoked significant debate ( 50 , 51 ). In addition, samples measured by the Pyr-GC-MS instruments on the Mars Viking lander and the Curiosity rover ( 34 , 43 , 52 ) deserve new evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%