2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3524222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits for the vortex state spin torque oscillator in magnetic nanopillars: Micromagnetic simulations for a thin free layer

Abstract: Anomalous magnetic properties of 7nm single-crystal Co3O4 nanowires J. Appl. Phys. 111, 013910 (2012) High field-gradient dysprosium tips for magnetic resonance force microscopy Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 013102 (2012) Dipolar interactions in magnetic nanowire aggregates J. Appl. Phys. 110, 123924 (2011) Dielectric and spin relaxation behaviour in DyFeO3 nanocrystals J. Appl. Phys. 110, 124301 (2011) Finite size versus surface effects on magnetic properties of antiferromagnetic particles Appl. Phys. Le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the dynamical scenarios reported by Aranda et al , we do not see the in‐plane magnetization oscillation when the VC is expelled out of the dot. This may be due to the larger thickness of our disk, because a thicker dot corresponds to a larger exciting current, and it will induce a higher Oersted field, which makes the S or C state unstable.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the dynamical scenarios reported by Aranda et al , we do not see the in‐plane magnetization oscillation when the VC is expelled out of the dot. This may be due to the larger thickness of our disk, because a thicker dot corresponds to a larger exciting current, and it will induce a higher Oersted field, which makes the S or C state unstable.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…The characteristic mechanism depends on the dot size, for example, the VC are switched by the first type when R ¼ 100 nm, however, the VC is reversed by the second type when R ¼ 200 nm. The Compared with the dynamical scenarios reported by Aranda et al [30], we do not see the in-plane magnetization oscillation when the VC is expelled out of the dot. This may be due to the larger thickness of our disk, because a thicker dot corresponds to a larger exciting current, and it will induce a higher Oersted field, which makes the S or C state unstable.…”
Section: Ii-iii Psupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…at the nanoscale), (ii) broad and steady working frequency. Currently, STNOs are roughly divided into two kinds: (a) precessional motion of uniform magnetization [29] and (b) magnetic vortex oscillations [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Vortex-based STNOs could present a high output power [37], and a narrow spectral linewidth [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the polarity reversal also can be realized when VC is expelled out of the dot, i.e. a41 [19,20]. These two criterions determine the value of the second critical current density J 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%