2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits and potentials of office building climatisation with ambient air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is generally in line with an earlier scenario-based analysis by Roaf et al (1998), with empirical evidence for the exceptionally hot summer of 2003 (Eicker et al 2006), as well as with the studies of Geros et al (2005) and Kolokotroni et al (2006), who concluded that in urban areas increased temperatures of a few degrees significantly lower the performance of nighttime ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is generally in line with an earlier scenario-based analysis by Roaf et al (1998), with empirical evidence for the exceptionally hot summer of 2003 (Eicker et al 2006), as well as with the studies of Geros et al (2005) and Kolokotroni et al (2006), who concluded that in urban areas increased temperatures of a few degrees significantly lower the performance of nighttime ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In Southern Europe passive night-time cooling might not be sufficient the whole year round, but could still be used in hybrid systems. Eicker et al (2006) provided experimental evidence for the limitations of night-time ventilation under climatic conditions currently regarded as extreme. They monitored for three years an advanced low-energy office building in Weilheim, Germany, which was constructed in 1999, that was also equipped with an earth-to-air heat exchanger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good performance depends on the climate having a substantial annual temperature range so that the ground temperature (which will be close to the mean annual temperature) is comparatively cool. The ratio of the cooling obtained to fan energy required to move air through the earth pipe (analogous to the coefficient of performance (COP) of a heat pump or air conditioner) in experimental studies ranges from a low as about 5 in Italy (Solaini et al 1998) and 8 in India during the pre-monsoon hot period (Thanu et al 2001) to 30-50 in Germany (Eicker et al 2006). Up to a 70% reduction in the cooling load in the northern US is possible with earthpipe cooling (Lee and Strand 2008).…”
Section: Earth-pipe Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to the high temperature difference between the soil and air in the beginning of the duct, which continues to decrease as the air passes through the duct. Eicker compared the impact of different configurations of the ground cooling systems on the energy consumption of an office building in Germany [56][57][58]. They observed that even though the EAHE could function at a high coefficient of performance (approximately 30), the EAHE could only meet about 20% of the total cooling load of the office building.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%